Teams

Volley Girls

2021 NOVA Adult 18 & Over Weekday Women · NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.10 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-06-04vs You can Kiss my AceLost 01
L#1 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Andrea Henningsen vs Lisa Furgal / Angela Tomaszewski5-7, 5-4
2021-05-25vs I can't - I have TennisLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaribeth Burg / Stephanie Frauen vs Laura Hathaway / Michelle Tenhaeff1-6, 3-6
2021-05-18Lost 01
L#1 SinglesAndrea Henningsen vs Alyson Frost4-6, 1-6
2021-05-04Won 10
W#2 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Andrea Henningsen vs Jennifer Singh / Yesim Temeemi6-1, 7-5
2021-04-27vs You can Kiss my AceSplit 11
L#1 SinglesAbby Colucci vs Alyson Frost3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Olivia O'Brien vs Barb Long / Katie Plofchan6-3, 6-2
2021-04-13vs I can't - I have TennisLost 02
L#1 SinglesStephanie Frauen vs Leanne Drake3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Colucci / Andrea Henningsen vs Jennifer Singh / Michelle Tenhaeff4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-04-06vs You can Kiss my AceLost 02
L#1 DoublesStephanie Frauen / Laura Forster vs Paula Garrison / Tina Woods1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAbby Colucci / Caroline Chopus vs Angela Tomaszewski / Caroline Mia Lee2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 18 & Over Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.87 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Andrea Henningsen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.05
Stephanie Frauen
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
2.88
Abby Colucci
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.83
Indre Conners
published 3
2.76
Caroline Chopus
published 3
2.65
Maribeth Burg
published
2.62
Lisa Givens
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andrea Henningsen + Stephanie Frauen3645% gamesnot enough data
Stephanie Frauen + Abby Colucci033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Henningsen
60W–74L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%93%6%
3.30
3
Stephanie Frauen
117W–162L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%36%64%
3.05
3
Abby Colucci
53W–53L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Indre Conners
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Caroline Chopus
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
2%95%3%
2.76
Maribeth Burg
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
12%88%<1%
2.65
Lisa Givens
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
17%83%<1%
2.62

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.