Teams

Brown/Berreth - Tri55s W 4.0/3.5/3.0 Thurs

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 55 & Over · 4.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-23vs Collins Tri55 W 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue White / Myra Propst vs Suzanne Andia / Lauren Collins2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJacqueline Herron / Robyn Manning vs Floy Collis / Mary Jane Tarver6-4, 6-0
2024-06-28vs Dulin - Tri55s W 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Michelle Shoemaker vs Lora Snyder / Rhonda Glenn6-7, 4-6
2024-06-20vs Collins Tri55 W 4.0/3.5/3.0 ThursWon 10
W#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Michelle Shoemaker vs Libby Wilson / Lauren Collins6-2, 7-5
2024-06-06vs Dulin - Tri55s W 4.0/3.5/3.0Lost 02
L#2 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Robyn Manning vs Debbie Clancy / Michele Shigo3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Eleanor Redding vs Lora Snyder / Kelly Albright5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Pam McAmis
published
3.68
Ann Evans
published 4
3.44
Jacqueline Herron
published
3.40
Kathy Hedgecock
published
3.32
Gladys Dunn
published
3.31
Kathy Brown
published
3.29
Margaret Joseph
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.25
Robyn Manning
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Michelle Shoemaker
published
2.84
Sue White
published
2.84
Eleanor Redding
published
2.78
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Manning + Margaret Joseph5259% games+4.5% vs expected
Sue White + Gladys Dunn213 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pam McAmis
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.71
4
Ann Evans
22W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Jacqueline Herron
36W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.44
Kathy Hedgecock
23W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
Gladys Dunn
28W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Kathy Brown
14W–21L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
3.31
Margaret Joseph
16W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.29
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.28
Robyn Manning
139W–69L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.25
Michelle Shoemaker
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Cindy Wood
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Myra Propst
146W–178L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.