Teams

CORTA/Cheryl Williams

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall · Women 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.38 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-10-29vs Pate/Curtis-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesTracey Kiser / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Ruthie Hite / Janet Jenkins6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAndrea Centerbar / Tracey Olds vs Amanda Teat / Katherine Williams4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Maureen Bolinger vs Donna Akin / Pauline Marth6-4, 6-4
2024-10-26vs Ha-CCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Darlene Marshall vs Laura Auer / Lynne Williamson1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMelodie Broderick / Maureen Bolinger vs Jon Walburg / Renee Wilkinson2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesAmy Nelson / Eunice Ampiaw vs Jeanene Wolf / Yun Ha3-6, 1-6
2024-10-23vs Galbraith/Wilson-GIWon 21
L#1 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Tracey Kiser vs Sherry Bunn / Sue Goldman4-6, 6-0, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Melodie Broderick vs Elizabeth Borom / Robin Snipes3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Nelson / Andrea Centerbar vs Paula Watkins / Mary Bruce6-3, 6-4
2024-10-15vs CORTA/Sheila EzellLost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Hrach / Maureen Bolinger vs Jamie Smith / Pam Knight2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCheryl Williams-Allen / Tracey Kiser vs Kerri Medders / Melissa Foy4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Tracey Olds vs Sheila Ezell / Wanda Morpeth4-6, 2-6
2024-10-03vs CORTA/Sheila EzellWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracey Kiser / Allison Johnson vs Pam Knight / Kerri Medders6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesMelodie Broderick / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Missy Mizzell / Tracey Stribling5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Tracey Olds vs Melissa Foy / Valorie Harbour7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-29vs Pate/Curtis-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesTracey Kiser / Allison Johnson vs Belinda Shively / Kathryn English6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Robin King / Joi Liscar6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesEunice Ampiaw / Tracey Olds vs Amanda Teat / Pegi Williams6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2024-09-24vs Ha-CCWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Johnson / Tracey Kiser vs Cissy Sanders / Bobbi Starr7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDarlene Marshall / Cheryl Williams-Allen vs Renee Wilkinson / Crystal Wilson6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarmita Duke / Susan Hrach vs Lissa Mummert / Jon Walburg6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs Galbraith/Wilson-GILost 12
L#1 DoublesAmy Nelson / Carmita Duke vs Elizabeth Borom / Robin Snipes1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaureen Bolinger / Darlene Marshall vs Charisse Hill / Tracy Dean7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesEunice Ampiaw / Lianna Miller vs Allison Coleman / Traci Courville1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Darlene Marshall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.10
Maureen Bolinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.00
Cheryl Williams-Allen
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
2.93
Susan Hrach
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.91
Melodie Broderick
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Eunice Ampiaw
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Carmita Duke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.77
Tracey Olds
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Andrea Centerbar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Lianna Miller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tracey Kiser
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Williams-Allen + Tracey Kiser044 matchesnot enough data
Tracey Olds + Darlene Marshall224 matchesnot enough data
Cheryl Williams-Allen + Darlene Marshall213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darlene Marshall
13W–9L career · 8 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Maureen Bolinger
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.10
3.5
Cheryl Williams-Allen
12W–24L career · 7 lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.00
Susan Hrach
38W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Melodie Broderick
16W–23L career · 3 lines in 2025
74%26%<1%
2.91
Eunice Ampiaw
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
94%6%<1%
2.78
3.5
Carmita Duke
12W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.78
Tracey Olds
52W–46L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%3%97%
2.77
3
Andrea Centerbar
2W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lianna Miller
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tracey Kiser
6W–7L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.