Teams

Galbraith/Wilson-GI

2025 CORTA USTA Adult 55 & Over - Fall · Women 3.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-10-23vs CORTA/Cheryl WilliamsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSherry Bunn / Sue Goldman vs Cheryl Williams-Allen / Tracey Kiser6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Borom / Robin Snipes vs Darlene Marshall / Melodie Broderick6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesPaula Watkins / Mary Bruce vs Amy Nelson / Andrea Centerbar3-6, 4-6
2024-10-13vs Pate/Curtis-CCWon 21
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Borom / Sue Goldman vs Amanda Teat / Gwen Cogar4-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLisa Galbraith / Charisse Hill vs Katherine Williams / Ruthie Hite7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesDonna Lowery / Rashmi Hudson vs Pauline Marth / Pamela Burt4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-09-22vs CORTA/Cheryl WilliamsWon 21
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Borom / Robin Snipes vs Amy Nelson / Carmita Duke6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCharisse Hill / Tracy Dean vs Maureen Bolinger / Darlene Marshall5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Coleman / Traci Courville vs Eunice Ampiaw / Lianna Miller6-1, 6-3
2024-09-18vs Pate/Curtis-CCLost 03
L#1 DoublesSherry Bunn / Sue Goldman vs Amanda Teat / Gwen Cogar5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRena Wilson / Lisa Galbraith vs Belinda Shively / Katherine Williams2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDonna Lowery / Paula Watkins vs Janet Jenkins / Donna Akin1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.96 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Charisse Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lisa Galbraith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.15
Robin Snipes
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Allison Coleman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Elizabeth Borom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.07
Sue Goldman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Sherry Bunn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Rashmi Hudson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Susan Culpepper
published
2.99
Paula Watkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.91
Paige Dudley
published
2.82
Tracy Dean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Donna Lowery
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Mary Bruce
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Traci Courville
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rena Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Sharon Hamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sherry Bunn + Elizabeth Borom171554% games+8.9% vs expected
Elizabeth Borom + Sue Goldman2348% games+6.4% vs expected
Sherry Bunn + Sue Goldman9653% games+1.9% vs expected
Rena Wilson + Robin Snipes4252% games−7.2% vs expected
Elizabeth Borom + Lisa Galbraith314 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Galbraith + Sue Goldman314 matchesnot enough data
Susan Culpepper + Rena Wilson123 matchesnot enough data
Susan Culpepper + Lisa Galbraith033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charisse Hill
3W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lisa Galbraith
19W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Robin Snipes
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
15%85%1%
3.15
3.5
Allison Coleman
9W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.13
Elizabeth Borom
43W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Sue Goldman
37W–31L career · 3 lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.07
Sherry Bunn
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Rashmi Hudson
5W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Susan Culpepper
12W–21L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.02
Paula Watkins
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
2.99
Paige Dudley
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
Tracy Dean
13W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Donna Lowery
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.75
Mary Bruce
1W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
97%3%<1%
2.73
Traci Courville
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
2.63
Rena Wilson
10W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sharon Hamm
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.