Teams

Horsepower Hitters

2024 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-09-23vs Net ResultsWon 10
W#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Leah Butler6-2
2024-09-22vs Smash SistersSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Meador vs Vasey Stephens6-4
L#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Katelyn Carlock0-6
2024-09-16vs BallersLost 01
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Meador vs Caitlin Bower1-6
2024-09-11vs Better HalvesSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarolyn Meador vs Catherine Jones6-1
L#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Jacqueline Lawley1-6
2024-09-04vs Team Barty PartyLost 01
L#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Taylor Barton0-6
2024-08-22vs The Loose TanninsLost 01
L#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Karyn Goodale-Durham6-7
2024-08-18vs BallersWon 10
W#2 SinglesCarolyn Meador vs Tannan Koehl6-3
2024-08-17vs Double TroubleLost 02
L#1 SinglesCarolyn Meador vs Angela Troy1-6
L#2 SinglesNikki Whiting vs Alice Livesay1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Full Metal Rackets80213359
2Better Halves71177781
3Ballers61147777
4Double Trouble62195565
5LDT!52165561
6Ball Busters52138886
7The Loose Tannins4311101087
8Nothing but Love3287774
9Tennis Chicks3287773
10Team Barty Party34129984
11Smash Sisters3591515113
12Racquettes 2.02671717117
13Horsepower Hitters1771717124
14Swingin' Seesters1761818128
15Match Makers1751919121
16Net Results0712020125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.79
Carolyn Meador
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Nikki Whiting
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
Jennifer Rusk
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Rusk + Nikki Whiting81053% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Rusk + Carolyn Meador21242% gamesnot enough data
Nikki Whiting + Carolyn Meador134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Carolyn Meador
82W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Nikki Whiting
21W–33L career · 6 lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73
Jennifer Rusk
44W–62L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.