Teams

Nothing but Love

2024 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Women 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.17 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-09-13vs Swingin' SeestersLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Peterson vs Katie Tunca0-6
2024-09-05vs Ball BustersLost 01
L#2 SinglesJill Peterson vs Brittany Morris6-7
2024-08-23vs Match MakersLost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Peterson vs Megan Chau3-6
2024-08-16vs Full Metal RacketsWon 10
W#1 SinglesJill Peterson vs Ashley Bryngelson7-5
2024-08-12vs Racquettes 2.0Lost 01
L#1 SinglesJill Peterson vs Stacey Kozakar4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings16 teams · Women 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Full Metal Rackets80213359
2Better Halves71177781
3Ballers61147777
4Double Trouble62195565
5LDT!52165561
6Ball Busters52138886
7The Loose Tannins4311101087
8Nothing but Love3287774
9Tennis Chicks3287773
10Team Barty Party34129984
11Smash Sisters3591515113
12Racquettes 2.02671717117
13Horsepower Hitters1771717124
14Swingin' Seesters1761818128
15Match Makers1751919121
16Net Results0712020125

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Kim Buchanan
published 3.5
3.08
Jill Peterson
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3
2.73
Brenda Bourn
published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Kim Buchanan
52W–61L career · type A · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Jill Peterson
67W–68L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Brenda Bourn
24W–24L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.73

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.