Teams

Arnett/McCluskey - Tri18s 3.5/3.0/2.5 Mon

2024 Piedmont Tri-Level 18 & Over · 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.17 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Karrah Durham
published
3.38
3.31
Martha Fogleman
published
3.13
Toni Lewis
published
2.98
Alexis Ganesh
published 3
2.97
Sammie Jo McCluskey
published
2.95
2.94
Shannon Roley
published
2.85
Gracia Tilley
published
2.81
Sarah Lovett
published
2.79
Raychel Lockwood
published
2.60
Hunter Arnett
published
Leslie Sheppard
published
Sam Wyrick
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sammie Jo McCluskey + Catherine Johnstone8071% games+12.5% vs expected
Martha Fogleman + Toni Lewis2451% games+7.0% vs expected
Sarah Lovett + Catherine Johnstone123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Karrah Durham
25W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Christina Schulenklopper
17W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%79%21%
3.38
Martha Fogleman
25W–18L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.31
Toni Lewis
12W–21L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
3.13
3
Alexis Ganesh
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%56%44%
2.98
Sammie Jo McCluskey
34W–21L career · no lines in 2024
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Catherine Johnstone
34W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%65%35%
2.95
Shannon Roley
13W–22L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
2.94
Gracia Tilley
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
2.85
Sarah Lovett
7W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
Raychel Lockwood
5W–3L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.79
Hunter Arnett
7W–21L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
2.60
Leslie Sheppard
4W–12L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Sam Wyrick
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.