Teams

NITA E 40W40e Score (Bianchi/Knutte)

2022 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesLisa Rowen / Ngozi Ezike vs Linda Wright / Alicja Kujalowicz1-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJanet Wolf / Kelly Good vs Ceyda Arslan / Christi Cashman7-5, 5-4
L#3 DoublesCarlene Motto / Kristine Lonsway vs Shannon Ebner / Kelly O'Donnell6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Janet Wolf vs Anna Hartford / Andrea Church6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesCindy Bielik vs Jennifer Lenahan6-4, 1-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Abbs / Carlene Motto vs Ellen Elliot / Penny Knapik6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesNgozi Ezike / Laurie Knutte vs Anna Tur / Lisa Stephens6-3, 6-4
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Janet Wolf vs Kimberly Ricchio / Debra Brambora6-0, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKimberly Abbs / Marinne Leonard vs Christine Frantzen / Becky Schenk1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCindy Bielik / Carlene Motto vs Patricia Behnke / Hoda Elshakankery6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Janet Wolf vs Angie Ulie / Kristin Stumm6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Bielik / Kristine Lonsway vs Michelle Schalz / Ella Lord6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Rowen / Kerri Sedlacek vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Janet Wolf vs Nancy Cushing / Jessica Grizzell6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKimberly Abbs / Laurie Knutte vs Terri Parse / Julie Roth6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDiana Pavlova / Kerri Sedlacek vs Julie Boruff / Kristin Lamb3-6, 6-5, 0-1
W#1 DoublesKelly Good / Janet Wolf vs Vanessa Baker / Elisabeth Sanders6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesCindy Bielik vs Christy McGovern2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Abbs / Marinne Leonard vs Nikki Rivera / Robin Dickerson6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaurie Knutte / Diana Pavlova vs Vera McCray / Amy Harper3-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W40e Score (Bianchi/Knutte)6018617191
2NITA E 40W40g Centre Court (Ricchio/Brambora)5115920162
3NITA E 40W40b Rush Copley (Tansey/Elliot)4215922179
4NITA E 40W40d Hinsdale RC (Wright/Mihajlovic)3315922196
5NITA E 40W40f Courts Plus (Barsotti)2491533225
6NITA E 40W40h Five Star (Yaeger/Lyons)1561839258
7WITHDREW NITA E 40W40a Rush Copley (Adams)000000
8NITA E 40W40i Vaughan AC (Sleezer)0661838255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.09
Janet Wolf
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
4.08
Cindy Bielik
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
4.01
Ngozi Ezike
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.90
Laurie Knutte
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Marinne Leonard
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Lisa Rowen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.67
Carlene Motto
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Diana Pavlova
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Kerri Sedlacek
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.42
Kelly Good
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
2.98
Katherine Bianchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kimberly Abbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Kristine Lonsway
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kimberly Abbs + Laurie Knutte5260% games+14.0% vs expected
Kristine Lonsway + Cindy Bielik4260% games+12.1% vs expected
Carlene Motto + Cindy Bielik5365% games+11.3% vs expected
Janet Wolf + Cindy Bielik8164% games+9.6% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Janet Wolf6066% games+7.6% vs expected
Ngozi Ezike + Janet Wolf4258% games+7.5% vs expected
Lisa Rowen + Cindy Bielik10461% games+6.2% vs expected
Marinne Leonard + Cindy Bielik11657% games+4.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Wolf
136W–76L career · 6 lines in 2022
24%75%<1%
4.09
4
Cindy Bielik
216W–91L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
4.08
4
Ngozi Ezike
301W–168L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Laurie Knutte
256W–121L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Marinne Leonard
156W–82L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Lisa Rowen
153W–58L career · 2 lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Carlene Motto
131W–124L career · 3 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.67
4
Diana Pavlova
20W–32L career · 2 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.66
4
Kerri Sedlacek
99W–73L career · 5 lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.56
Kelly Good
111W–92L career · 6 lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
3.42
Katherine Bianchi
84W–66L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%57%43%
2.98
Kimberly Abbs
23W–18L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristine Lonsway
97W–80L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.