Teams

NITA E 40W40i Vaughan AC (Sleezer)

2022 NITA1 ESL Adult 40 & Over · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN ILLINOIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesAngie Ulie / Melissa Held vs Linda Wright / Annette Hennessy2-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLisa Zanke vs Katerina Hickey6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBetsy Dettro / Michelle Schalz vs Ginger Riessen / Ceyda Arslan1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Desens / Britt Bischoff vs Kelly O'Donnell / Alicja Kujalowicz1-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKristin Stumm / Angie Ulie vs Kimberly Ricchio / Debra Brambora4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJoanne Sleezer / Melissa Held vs Christine Frantzen / Marcy Reeb3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElla Lord / Michelle Schalz vs Hoda Elshakankery / Lara Phillips0-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesKristin Stumm / Angie Ulie vs Kristin Lamb / Donna Wilson6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesElla Lord / Melissa Held vs Julie Boruff / Terri Parse6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesAngie Ulie / Kristin Stumm vs Kelly Good / Janet Wolf2-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesLisa Zanke vs Meghan Jones4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Schalz / Ella Lord vs Cindy Bielik / Kristine Lonsway4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesAngie Ulie / Kimberly Carpenter vs Dorothy OMalley / Vanessa Baker4-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesElla Lord / Nancy Parker vs Donna Smoldt / Alicia Yaeger7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesKelly Deufel / Betsy Dettro vs Lori Toney / Karen Jackson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 DoublesAngie Ulie / Melissa Held vs Andrea Church / Anna Hartford4-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLisa Zanke vs Penny Knapik6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesElla Lord / Nancy Parker vs Lisa Stephens / Valerie Nagel2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelly Deufel / Kimberly Carpenter vs Rebecca Geraci / Vicki Mitchell1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · NITA ESL 40 & Over 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NITA E 40W40e Score (Bianchi/Knutte)6018617191
2NITA E 40W40g Centre Court (Ricchio/Brambora)5115920162
3NITA E 40W40b Rush Copley (Tansey/Elliot)4215922179
4NITA E 40W40d Hinsdale RC (Wright/Mihajlovic)3315922196
5NITA E 40W40f Courts Plus (Barsotti)2491533225
6NITA E 40W40h Five Star (Yaeger/Lyons)1561839258
7WITHDREW NITA E 40W40a Rush Copley (Adams)000000
8NITA E 40W40i Vaughan AC (Sleezer)0661838255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Angie Ulie
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Andrea Purpura
published 4
3.58
Melissa Held
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.26
Michelle Schalz
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Betsy Dettro
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.18
Ella Lord
usually #1 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 46% · published 3.5
3.13
Kelly Deufel
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.93
Kimberly Jesseman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Joanne Sleezer
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Karen Desens
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kimberly Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lisa Zanke
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nancy Parker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Angie Ulie + Kimberly Jesseman2346% games+5.6% vs expected
Ella Lord + Karen Desens5255% games+4.4% vs expected
Ella Lord + Kimberly Jesseman2347% games+3.1% vs expected
Kimberly Jesseman + Kelly Deufel101645% games−1.2% vs expected
Angie Ulie + Melissa Held2842% games−2.1% vs expected
Joanne Sleezer + Angie Ulie81345% games−3.5% vs expected
Joanne Sleezer + Kelly Deufel0936% games−5.8% vs expected
Ella Lord + Kelly Deufel1626% games−7.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Angie Ulie
102W–120L career · 6 lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.76
4
Andrea Purpura
5W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melissa Held
53W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.58
Michelle Schalz
22W–19L career · 8 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Betsy Dettro
4W–19L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Ella Lord
78W–82L career · 11 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Kelly Deufel
89W–134L career · 5 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Kimberly Jesseman
55W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
2.93
Joanne Sleezer
42W–68L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Karen Desens
28W–29L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kimberly Carpenter
11W–13L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lisa Zanke
21W–24L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Parker
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.