Teams

MEMPK MARKLEY

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.92 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs CSRC MCPHERSONSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNick Meding / Jarek Markley vs Tony Adkison / Michael Bagwell6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesThomas Owens / Nathan Rarangol vs William Asiano / Michael Bigelow4-6, 6-7
2023-05-24vs LTFCS COLESSplit 11
W#1 DoublesNick Meding / Jarek Markley vs Adam Fulmer / Rob Wilson6-3, 6-4
L#2 SinglesMark Lehrer vs Lewis Wilcox3-6, 1-6
2023-05-17vs CCW ARGOSSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Blevin / Ben Lowe vs Daniel Michon / Lee Wolfe4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJarek Markley / Mark Lehrer vs Erik Drake / John Whipple2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2023-05-03vs FHCS MADSENWon 10
W#1 DoublesBen Lowe / Michael Blevin vs Steve Shawver / Thomas White6-3, 7-6
2023-04-26vs CSRC MCPHERSONWon 21
W#1 DoublesBen Lowe / Michael Blevin vs Jon Bayne / William Asiano6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJarek Markley vs Conner Crosby7-5, 6-2
L#2 SinglesMark Lehrer vs James Blackmon6-7, 6-0, 0-1
2023-04-19vs LTFCS COLESWon 20
W#1 DoublesBen Lowe / Michael Blevin vs Bryan ODonnell / Adam Fulmer6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesJarek Markley / Nathan Rarangol vs Conrad Fitz / Richie Fike7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Michael Blevin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.95
Ben Lowe
published 4
3.91
3.88
Jarek Markley
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.78
Roger Cova Andrade
published
3.63
Mark Lehrer
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Nathan Rarangol
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Sheldon Chinnery
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ben Lowe + Michael Blevin8067% games+15.6% vs expected
Michael Blevin + Mark Lehrer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Blevin
55W–27L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
4.03
4
Ben Lowe
30W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
David Brad Young II
13W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Jarek Markley
49W–40L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%19%
3.88
Roger Cova Andrade
8W–7L career · no lines in 2023
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Mark Lehrer
24W–60L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Nathan Rarangol
18W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
Sheldon Chinnery
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.