Teams

CSRC MCPHERSON

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-31vs MEMPK MARKLEYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesTony Adkison / Michael Bagwell vs Nick Meding / Jarek Markley2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesWilliam Asiano / Michael Bigelow vs Thomas Owens / Nathan Rarangol6-4, 7-6
2023-05-24vs FHCS MADSENWon 10
W#2 DoublesJon Bayne / Tony Adkison vs Brad Claus / Michael Park6-0, 7-5
2023-05-10Lost 01
L#3 DoublesWilliam Asiano / Dave Downie vs Conrad Fitz / Eric Hillebrandt4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2023-05-03vs CCW ARGOSLost 02
L#1 DoublesWilliam Asiano / Michael Bagwell vs David StClair / George Argos4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesTony Adkison / Jon Bayne vs Daniel Michon / Lee Wolfe6-7, 4-6
2023-04-26vs MEMPK MARKLEYLost 02
L#1 DoublesJon Bayne / William Asiano vs Ben Lowe / Michael Blevin1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesStephan Forster / Tony Adkison vs Thomas Owens / Sheldon Chinnery3-6, 3-6
2023-04-19vs FHCS MADSENWon 10
W#1 DoublesJon Bayne / William Asiano vs Todd Madsen / Paul Reeder6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Bruce Wadman
published 4
Conner Crosby
published 4
3.55
William Asiano
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.51
Michael Bigelow
published
3.46
Tony Adkison
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.40
James McPherson
published
James Blackmon
published
Jon Bayne
published
Michael Bagwell
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tony Adkison + William Asiano3745% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Bruce Wadman
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
Conner Crosby
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
William Asiano
53W–74L career · 5 lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Michael Bigelow
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
48%52%<1%
3.51
4
Tony Adkison
56W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.46
James McPherson
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
76%24%<1%
3.40
James Blackmon
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jon Bayne
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Bagwell
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.