Teams

NJ GREEN

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs EPR GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesHeidi Warriner / Kathy Peterson vs Lauren Anderson / Carole Lofing7-6, 6-4
W#1 SinglesNatalie Schaefer vs Jennifer Halboth6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChristy Carello / Mary Bare vs Nancy Hiester / Karen Morris4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesNatalie Cervera / Helen Hock vs Kellie Bonthron / Gwen Riley1-6, 7-6, 0-1
2022-05-26vs NJ BLACKWon 32
W#1 DoublesHeidi Warriner / Julie Lochner vs Holland Asbach / Caitlin Bock6-1, 7-6
W#1 SinglesNatalie Schaefer vs Erin Parks6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesNatalie Cervera / Helen Hock vs Christine Gilpatric / Ashley Joyce4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAngela Harper vs Anar DEMARCO7-6, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMary Bare / Elizabeth Shields vs Danielle Murphy / Maggie Carson7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2022-05-19vs RHCC BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesAngela Harper / Heidi Warriner vs Catherine Rossano / Stephanie Joens6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesNatalie Schaefer vs Tricia Huguelet2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesMary Bare / Natalie Cervera vs Susan Weese / Valerie VanAlsburg4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJulie Lochner vs Katie Wither6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Shields / Kathy Peterson vs Julia McVey / Sandra Michel0-6, 2-6
2022-05-12vs MC REDWon 32
L#1 DoublesWanda Shepherd / Christy Carello vs Ellen Davis / Kristin Harvey2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Liebelson vs Kimberly Schnetzer6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesHelen Hock / Heidi Warriner vs Lauren Arnold / Erin Brzeczek6-2, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAngela Harper vs Heidi Huber6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMary Bare / Elizabeth Shields vs Pamela Catalano / Janice Tanabe7-5, 2-6, 0-1
2022-05-05vs LTC BLUELost 23
W#1 DoublesAngela Harper / Heidi Warriner vs Nancy Driver / Pamela Schmidt6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJulie Lochner vs Shana Fonte6-7, 3-4
L#2 DoublesChristy Carello / Wanda Shepherd vs April Kobayashi / Ginny Laadt2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesLauren Liebelson vs Jessica McHugh0-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHelen Hock / Kathy Peterson vs Christie Bibeau / Martha McNamara3-6, 2-6
2022-04-28vs HIW REDLost 14
W#1 DoublesAngela Harper / Wanda Shepherd vs Palmira Miner / Mieke Scripps6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesNatalie Schaefer vs Sue Speyer6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Peterson / Natalie Cervera vs Nicole Reyes / Katie Linkner4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Liebelson vs Nora Alby3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMary Bare / Elizabeth Shields vs Lark Stewart / Susan Guest3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-04-21vs BP GREENWon 32
L#1 DoublesJulie Lochner / Angela Harper vs Katie Clymer / Alison Shaw6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNatalie Schaefer vs Kristin VonSpreecken6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKathy Peterson / Heidi Warriner vs Jo Johnson / Karleigh Kimble6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLauren Liebelson vs Katie Shaw0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesChristy Carello / Natalie Cervera vs Donna Cash / Katie Todd7-6, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Heidi Warriner
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Angela Harper
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
3.60
Julie Lochner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.28
Cynthia Snavely
published 3.5
Christy Carello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.18
Natalie Schaefer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.15
Kathy Peterson
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.08
Wanda Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Helen Hock
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.62
Elizabeth Shields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Lauren Liebelson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Mary Bare
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Natalie Cervera
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cynthia Snavely + Heidi Warriner4167% games+13.9% vs expected
Cynthia Snavely + Wanda Shepherd8361% games+10.5% vs expected
Heidi Warriner + Angela Harper6164% games+7.3% vs expected
Elizabeth Shields + Christy Carello4450% games+4.9% vs expected
Julie Lochner + Angela Harper4156% games+2.5% vs expected
Mary Bare + Julie Lochner4261% games+0.2% vs expected
Kathy Peterson + Heidi Warriner4154% games+0.2% vs expected
Mary Bare + Kathy Peterson0538% games−1.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Heidi Warriner
80W–39L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Angela Harper
77W–79L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Julie Lochner
113W–54L career · 4 lines in 2022
23%77%<1%
3.60
3.5
Cynthia Snavely
78W–48L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Christy Carello
36W–49L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Natalie Schaefer
51W–31L career · 5 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.18
Kathy Peterson
43W–89L career · 5 lines in 2022
13%86%<1%
3.15
Wanda Shepherd
39W–41L career · 3 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.08
3.5
Helen Hock
39W–67L career · 4 lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
3.02
3
Elizabeth Shields
25W–41L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%81%<1%
2.62
Lauren Liebelson
3W–9L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Mary Bare
30W–58L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Natalie Cervera
18W–28L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.