Teams

HIW RED

2022 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 3.67 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-06-02vs RHCC BLUELost 13
W#1 DoublesLaurie Johnson / Nora Alby vs Susan Weese / Stephanie Joens6-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah Simon vs Catherine Rossano1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Linkner / Nicole Reyes vs Julia McVey / Valerie VanAlsburg2-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesPalmira Miner vs Rachel Kacmar6-7, 3-6
2022-05-26vs LTC BLUEWon 32
L#1 DoublesLaura Billups / Mieke Scripps vs Nancy Driver / Martha McNamara6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesNora Alby vs Shana Fonte6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKatie Linkner / Emily Lenich vs Linda Sexton / Christie Bibeau4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesPalmira Miner vs April Kobayashi6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLaurie Johnson / Lark Stewart vs Barbara Woodward / Ellen Muller6-1, 6-2
2022-05-24vs BP GREENWon 41
W#1 DoublesLaura Billups / Mieke Scripps vs Susan Gallo / Katie Todd6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesPalmira Miner vs Katie Clymer6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Linkner / Emily Lenich vs Cayti Stein / Donna Cash6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDeborah Simon vs Kristin VonSpreecken6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSusan Guest / Lark Stewart vs Judith Law / Jo Johnson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-05-13vs EPR GREENWon 40
W#1 DoublesNora Alby / Laura Billups vs Carole Lofing / Karen Morris6-0, 6-0
W#1 SinglesSue Speyer vs Lauren Anderson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMieke Scripps / Palmira Miner vs Gwen Riley / Nancy Hiester6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSusie Shipley / Laurie Johnson vs Kellie Bonthron / Linda Strauss6-1, 6-3
2022-05-12vs NJ BLACKWon 41
W#1 DoublesMieke Scripps / Palmira Miner vs Macy Bauerle / Pam Long6-0, 1-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSue Speyer vs Erin Parks7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusie Shipley / Laurie Johnson vs Caitlin Bock / Danielle Murphy6-0, 6-2
L#2 SinglesLark Stewart vs Anar DEMARCO1-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Billups / Nora Alby vs Michelle Pienknagura / Holland Asbach7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2022-05-05vs MC REDWon 41
W#1 DoublesLaurie Johnson / Palmira Miner vs Ellen Davis / Peggy Hofstra6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSue Speyer vs Ana Hunsinger6-7, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKatie Linkner / Susie Shipley vs Lauren Arnold / Erin Brzeczek4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMieke Scripps vs ELIZABETH SKLAROFF3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Guest / Lark Stewart vs Natalie Sanso / Heidi Huber6-3, 6-0
2022-04-28vs NJ GREENWon 41
L#1 DoublesPalmira Miner / Mieke Scripps vs Angela Harper / Wanda Shepherd3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesSue Speyer vs Natalie Schaefer4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNicole Reyes / Katie Linkner vs Kathy Peterson / Natalie Cervera6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesNora Alby vs Lauren Liebelson6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLark Stewart / Susan Guest vs Mary Bare / Elizabeth Shields6-3, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Susie Shipley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Palmira Miner
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 4
3.64
Sue Speyer
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.41
Nora Alby
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
3.39
Mieke Scripps
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 17% · published 3.5
Emily Lenich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lark Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
3.12
Laura Billups
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.10
Katie Linkner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Deborah Simon
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Susan Guest
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Linkner + Susie Shipley6165% games+13.6% vs expected
Emily Lenich + Susie Shipley7070% games+12.3% vs expected
Susie Shipley + Palmira Miner4161% games+8.5% vs expected
Mieke Scripps + Susie Shipley5259% games+7.2% vs expected
Nora Alby + Susie Shipley5261% games+6.9% vs expected
Mieke Scripps + Palmira Miner18659% games+6.7% vs expected
Laura Billups + Sue Speyer14361% games+5.7% vs expected
Laura Billups + Palmira Miner5154% games+4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susie Shipley
63W–22L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.86
4
Palmira Miner
92W–53L career · 7 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Sue Speyer
79W–39L career · 4 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
Nora Alby
72W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Mieke Scripps
81W–52L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
3.5
Emily Lenich
21W–20L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lark Stewart
72W–43L career · 5 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
3.16
3.5
Laura Billups
98W–73L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Katie Linkner
45W–52L career · 5 lines in 2022
22%78%<1%
3.10
Deborah Simon
9W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Guest
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.