Teams

Aragon

2025 USTA Mixed 18 & Over · 6.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-26vs HusemanWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Otterness / Tessa Aragon vs Chad Huseman / Caroline Huseman6-1, 7-6
2025-08-12vs BrackLost 02
L#1 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Brian Otterness vs Ellie Aragon / Colton Reed3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Woolsey / David Blackwell vs Taren Wells / Connor Brack0-6, 1-6
2025-08-05vs HusemanLost 02
L#1 DoublesBrian Otterness / Claudia Aragon vs Jason Permenter / Caroline Huseman2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Hargrove / Tessa Aragon vs Phil Slaton / Kristi Mahoney0-6, 4-6
2025-07-29vs BounLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarlos Aragon / Jennifer Woolsey vs Jesus Teposte / Kimberly Mendosa4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Hargrove / Claudia Aragon vs Bounhieng Manhkong / Khin Lwin2-6, 2-6
2025-07-22vs BrackSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCarlos Aragon / Tessa Aragon vs Landon Brack / Ellie Aragon2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Otterness / Claudia Aragon vs Connor Brack / Taren Wells6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-07-15vs HusemanLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarlos Aragon / Tessa Aragon vs Chad Huseman / Julian Huseman6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2025-07-08vs BounLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarlos Aragon / Tessa Aragon vs Jeremiah Tep / Khin Lwin2-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesStephen Hargrove / Jennifer Woolsey vs Samuel Berryman / Jennifer Puentes1-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.62
Claudia Aragon
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.38
Connor Brack
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Landon Brack
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Carlos Aragon
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.27
Tessa Aragon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
3.25
Jordan Woody
published
3.14
Michelle Swadling
published
3.03
Jennifer Woolsey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.71
Julie Burleson
published
Greg Keesee
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tessa Aragon + Carlos Aragon134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Claudia Aragon
12W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%21%79%
3.62
3.5
Connor Brack
6W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%80%19%
3.38
Landon Brack
8W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%16%
3.36
3.5
Carlos Aragon
11W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.30
Tessa Aragon
17W–6L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.27
Jordan Woody
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Michelle Swadling
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Jennifer Woolsey
12W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
3.03
Julie Burleson
2W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
Greg Keesee
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.