Teams

Redding 3.0W 55s Thurs PM

2024 Piedmont USTA 55 & Over · WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-05-09vs Shivaji Selley 3.0W 55s Thurs PMLost 01
L#3 DoublesSue White / Myra Propst vs Renuka Shivaji / Camille Andy6-7, 3-6
2024-04-23vs Farley/Cooke 3.0W 55s Thur PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesSusan Bailey / Myra Propst vs Cindy Cooke / Susan Rogers7-5, 6-3
2024-04-04vs Shivaji Selley 3.0W 55s Thurs PMLost 01
L#1 DoublesMyra Propst / Terri Laughlin vs Maria Linden / Karen D Smith2-6, 6-7
2024-03-14vs Gorham 3.0W 55s Thurs PMWon 10
W#2 DoublesMyra Propst / Lydia Nadel vs Janet Gorham / Bobbi McEntee6-2, 6-3
2024-03-07Won 10
W#3 DoublesMyra Propst / Cindy Wood vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.94
Michelle Shoemaker
published
2.84
Sue White
published
2.84
Eleanor Redding
published
2.83
Ila Rosenthal
published
2.83
Terri Laughlin
published
2.79
Susan Bailey
published
2.78
Cindy Wood
published 3
2.77
Ann Fair
published 3
2.65
Myra Propst
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.65
Lydia Nadel
published
2.47
Rose Chrismon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sue White + Margaret Lynde-Rhyne033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Shoemaker
12W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%66%34%
2.94
Sue White
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Eleanor Redding
5W–22L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Ila Rosenthal
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%12%
2.83
Terri Laughlin
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
2.83
Susan Bailey
4W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Cindy Wood
9W–12L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
Margaret Lynde-Rhyne
19W–30L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Ann Fair
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Myra Propst
146W–178L career · 10 lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Lydia Nadel
4W–13L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
2.65
Rose Chrismon
3W–26L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.