Teams

Stonebriar/Tuttle W3.5

2022 DTA 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Thursday League

13 players · average NTRP 3.30 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Thursday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Lauren Sheaks
published
3.44
Lea Plamann
published
3.44
Nicole Graham
published
3.41
Andrea Tuttle
published 3.5
3.34
Lisa Oldham
published
3.32
Cynthia Bunch
published 3.5
3.31
Kristi Barrientos
published
3.26
Jennifer Barnes
published
3.22
Deedee Wise
published 3.5
Deborah Giger
published 3
2.58
Anita Whitney
published 3
Darla Ashby
published
Nancy Debergh
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lauren Sheaks + Lea Plamann3555% games+12.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Sheaks
11W–13L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
Lea Plamann
17W–37L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
3.44
Nicole Graham
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
3.5
Andrea Tuttle
10W–18L career · no lines in 2022
<1%76%23%
3.41
Lisa Oldham
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
3.34
3.5
Cynthia Bunch
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.32
Kristi Barrientos
7W–16L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Jennifer Barnes
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Deedee Wise
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3
Deborah Giger
0W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Anita Whitney
0W–6L career · no lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
2.58
Darla Ashby
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Debergh
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.