Teams

CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky

2025 SCTA Adult 65 & Over - CV · CV Women 9.0

9 players · average NTRP 4.36 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for CV Women 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.09 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Gail Warden
published 4.5
4.13
Brenda Williams
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.09
Anita Kamouri
published 4
4.09
Susan Lammers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.06
Barbara Eriksson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.02
Vickki Schlappi
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Andrea Polisky
published 4
Sheree Green
published
Sue Lambert
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sheree Green + Barbara Eriksson7456% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Gail Warden
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Brenda Williams
78W–66L career · 2 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
4.13
4
Anita Kamouri
16W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
4.09
4.5
Susan Lammers
42W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Barbara Eriksson
13W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Vickki Schlappi
67W–40L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
4.02
4
Andrea Polisky
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sheree Green
13W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Sue Lambert
32W–39L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.