← Search

Gail Warden

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
NANTUCKET, MA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 31W–12L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history43 matches
W
2026-04-17 · CV-LLW-Mission Hills/Bowen & Polisky · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
6-1, 7-6
W
2026-04-10 · CV-LLW-Mission Hills/Bowen & Polisky · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-07 · CV-LLW-Mission Hills/Bowen & Polisky · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-02-23 · CV-Palm Desert TC/Lund · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Colleen Scanlon
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-02-09 · CV-Palm Desert TC/Lund · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kerrie Stavig
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-01-26 · CV-Palm Desert TC/Lund · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kimberly Skorupa
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-04-05 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Peltzer & Bulls · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2025-04-04 · CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Vineyard
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2025-04-03 · CV LLW-Mission Hills/Schlappi & Polisky · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rebecca Vineyard
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-3
L
2025-02-01 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Peltzer & Bulls · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-01-18 · CV-Indian Wells TG/Peltzer & Bulls · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Margaret Shepp
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2024-04-08 · CV-Mission Hills/Polisky/David · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Julie David
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
40%
2W–3L · 42.1% of games
9.0
76.3%
29W–9L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 42% of the time
#1 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams