Teams

MC NAVY

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

8 players · average NTRP 4.07 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-08vs NJ NAVYWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichelle Kondrat / Cameron Passmore vs Ann Stafford / Lisa Mountain5-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-01vs NJ TEALWon 10
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kondrat vs Pallavi Marulasiddappa6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2024-07-25vs BM YELLOWLost 02
L#1 DoublesJaime Stokes / ELIZABETH SKLAROFF vs Jenny Kelly / Deanna Deorio0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichelle Kondrat vs Jennifer Tucker4-6, 3-6
2024-07-18vs LPTC NAVYSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCameron Passmore / Jaime Stokes vs Bobbie Lutz / Holly Harrison6-3, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesMichelle Kondrat vs Deborah Freischlag6-1, 6-3
2024-07-15vs NJ NAVYWon 21
L#1 DoublesSue McGee / Jaime Stokes vs Darcie Coy / Sheri Wright3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Jill Mendoza6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesMichelle Kondrat / Jody Dart vs Lisa Mountain / Leslie Haines5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-07-11vs HIW ORANGEWon 20
W#1 SinglesCameron Passmore vs Minka Bosco6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMichelle Kondrat / Jody Dart vs Jeri Gardner / Cindy Middleton3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-27vs NJ TEALSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJaime Stokes / Jody Dart vs Pallavi Marulasiddappa / Natasha Uecker2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSue McGee / Anne Pielage vs Julie Lochner / Jessica Mitchell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.79 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.18
Cameron Passmore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
3.84
Sue McGee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.80
Michelle Kondrat
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Ana Hunsinger
published 4
3.73
Anne Pielage
published 4
3.70
ELIZABETH SKLAROFF
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Jody Dart
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jaime Stokes
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Hunsinger + Anne Pielage3252% games−4.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cameron Passmore
82W–32L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
9%89%1%
4.18
4
Sue McGee
6W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Michelle Kondrat
98W–61L career · 6 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
3.80
4
Ana Hunsinger
39W–25L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Anne Pielage
23W–18L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
4
ELIZABETH SKLAROFF
46W–60L career · 1 line in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Jody Dart
111W–88L career · 3 lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jaime Stokes
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.