Teams

LPTC NAVY

2024 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-08vs BM YELLOWWon 20
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Taylor Carney vs Sandy McGregor / Aree Bly6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesDeborah Freischlag / Fenny Evers vs Julie Pontiff / Casey Hemphill1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-08-01vs NJ NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Fenny Evers vs Charlene Bailey / Sheri Wright4-6, 1-6
2024-07-18vs MC NAVYSplit 11
W#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Holly Harrison vs Cameron Passmore / Jaime Stokes3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTamra Scaturro / Fenny Evers vs Ana Hunsinger / Anne Pielage2-6, 1-6
2024-07-17vs BM YELLOWLost 01
L#2 DoublesFenny Evers / Shannon Mooney vs Deanna Deorio / Aree Bly3-6, 4-6
2024-07-11vs NJ TEALWon 10
W#1 DoublesStacy Robins / Bobbie Lutz vs Anne Steputis / Kirstin Kraig6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Taylor Carney
published
3.65
Bobbie Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Holly Harrison
published
3.53
Dorothy Monroe
published
3.50
Shannon Mooney
published
3.48
Fenny Evers
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.42
Stacy Robins
published
2.94
Deborah Freischlag
published 3.5
Karan Tierney
published
Tamra Scaturro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Holly Harrison + Bobbie Lutz4250% games+3.2% vs expected
Bobbie Lutz + Taylor Carney314 matchesnot enough data
Stacy Robins + Bobbie Lutz033 matchesnot enough data
Shannon Mooney + Dorothy Monroe123 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Lutz + Fenny Evers123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Taylor Carney
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Bobbie Lutz
109W–67L career · 4 lines in 2024
14%86%1%
3.65
Holly Harrison
15W–28L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.62
Dorothy Monroe
4W–17L career · no lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
3.53
Shannon Mooney
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
51%49%<1%
3.50
4
Fenny Evers
46W–43L career · type A · 4 lines in 2024
55%45%<1%
3.48
Stacy Robins
0W–5L career · no lines in 2024
73%27%<1%
3.42
3.5
Deborah Freischlag
8W–36L career · no lines in 2024
67%33%<1%
2.94
Karan Tierney
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tamra Scaturro
0W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.