Teams

Basinger/18/7.5/CM/BTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

16 players · average NTRP 3.65 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 14 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 21 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Eric Basinger
Sep 28 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 12 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Eric Basinger
Oct 18 3:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 19 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
2026-08-31vs Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesShane Faulkner / Chad Doyal vs Levi Holley / Tyler Howard1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAustin Hedges / John Barr vs Slattery Johnson / Harry Johnson1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJamie Pipes / Jared Roge vs Thomas Rodsuwan / Todd Eppler6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesChad Doyal / Blake Thomas vs Robert Jeter / Jason Rogers7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesBrian Furqueron / Richard Karam vs Jared Stanton / Carter Culverhouse6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJared Roge / Steven Anderson vs Robert Crawford / Surinder Tank5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Basinger/18/7.5/CM/BTC1021225
2Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC000000
3Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC0112432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jared Roge
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Hayden Knight
published 4
3.75
Richard Karam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.74
Edward Burchett
published 4
3.66
Mike Fiser
published
3.56
Chad Doyal
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
John Barr
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.44
Blake Thomas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Jason Castro
published
3.42
Shane Faulkner
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.41
Jamie Pipes
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.40
Chris Tilley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Brian Furqueron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.23
Austin Hedges
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.19
James Hagan
published 3.5
3.15
Eric Basinger
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chad Doyal + Hayden Knight9357% games+7.0% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + Eric Basinger2637% games−0.1% vs expected
Edward Burchett + Richard Karam9252% games−2.0% vs expected
Brian Furqueron + James Hagan1536% games−10.1% vs expected
Jamie Pipes + Austin Hedges2348% gamesnot enough data
Edward Burchett + Brian Furqueron123 matchesnot enough data
Blake Thomas + Mike Fiser303 matchesnot enough data
Chad Doyal + Richard Karam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jared Roge
24W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.83
4
Hayden Knight
21W–12L career · no lines in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
Richard Karam
45W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Edward Burchett
18W–16L career · no lines in 2026
3%94%2%
3.74
Mike Fiser
21W–22L career · no lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
3.66
4
Chad Doyal
31W–22L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
3.56
John Barr
12W–26L career · 1 line in 2026
32%68%<1%
3.56
3.5
Blake Thomas
26W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.44
Jason Castro
2W–2L career · no lines in 2026
69%31%<1%
3.43
Shane Faulkner
17W–6L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Jamie Pipes
61W–41L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.41
3.5
Chris Tilley
28W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Brian Furqueron
47W–47L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%85%15%
3.36
3.5
Austin Hedges
28W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
James Hagan
14W–14L career · no lines in 2026
8%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Eric Basinger
31W–39L career · no lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
3.15

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.