Teams

Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 7.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 upcoming · 2 played
Sep 13 2:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 14 7:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Sep 21 7:30 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Sep 28 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Jared Stanton
Oct 5 6:00 PM
Pierremont Oaks Tennis Club
Oct 12 6:30 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 18 3:00 PM
North Bossier Tennis Center
Oct 19 6:00 PM
vs N/A
Jared Stanton
2026-08-24vs Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesRobert Crawford / Jared Stanton vs Thomas Rodsuwan / Tyler Howard1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesNorman Duhon / Carter Culverhouse vs Michael Lauseng / Jon Bryn6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2026-08-17vs Basinger/18/7.5/CM/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobert Jeter / Jason Rogers vs Chad Doyal / Blake Thomas6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJared Stanton / Carter Culverhouse vs Brian Furqueron / Richard Karam1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesRobert Crawford / Surinder Tank vs Jared Roge / Steven Anderson7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 7.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Basinger/18/7.5/CM/BTC1021225
2Lauseng/18/7.5/CM/BTC000000
3Stanton/18/7.5/CM/POTC0112432

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Surinder Tank
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Jared Stanton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.81
Colby Lorant
published 4
3.77
Robert Jeter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.73
Marcus Briggs
published
3.72
Norman Duhon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Blake Bunnett
published 3.5
3.43
Chad Souter
published 3.5
3.42
Tim Stuart
published
3.30
Joshua Hausmann
published
3.22
Carter Culverhouse
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Kyle Hill
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tim Stuart + Blake Bunnett5161% games+6.6% vs expected
Robert Jeter + Jared Stanton7356% games+0.6% vs expected
Marcus Briggs + Jared Stanton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Surinder Tank
12W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%53%47%
3.99
Jared Stanton
24W–24L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%85%15%
3.85
4
Colby Lorant
4W–2L career · type S · no lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
Robert Jeter
27W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.77
Marcus Briggs
10W–15L career · no lines in 2026
5%92%2%
3.73
Norman Duhon
19W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
3.5
Blake Bunnett
37W–14L career · no lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Chad Souter
14W–7L career · no lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
Tim Stuart
39W–20L career · no lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
Joshua Hausmann
5W–14L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Carter Culverhouse
5W–6L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.22
Kyle Hill
10W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.