Teams

CCW FALK

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

7 players · average NTRP 4.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-29vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 01
L#1 DoublesTerry Olerich / Wendy Jones vs Kristi Creps / Jamie Roach6-7, 1-6
2023-05-19vs CSRC LANGELost 02
L#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / Terry Olerich vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange7-6, 1-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesApril Falk / Sonia Garrison vs Patty Carpenter / Sandra Cook2-6, 2-6
2023-05-08vs CSRC LANGESplit 11
W#1 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Leanne Thompson / DARLENE WARMOUTH6-1, 7-5
L#2 DoublesRenee Crisler / Terry Olerich vs Jennifer Emerson / Kristen Lange4-6, 4-6
2023-05-01vs MEMPK GORTHYLost 02
L#1 DoublesTerry Olerich / Renee Crisler vs Shinobu Voss / Noriko Moody1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Angela Sullivan / Stefanie McCarron6-1, 3-6, 0-1
2023-04-24vs FLYHS LEVKUSWon 20
W#1 DoublesRenee Crisler / Terry Olerich vs Leslie Jaworowski / Maggie Wilson6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesApril Falk / Wendy Jones vs Jamie Roach / Kristi Creps6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.70 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
April Falk
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.76
Renee Crisler
published
3.75
Elizabeth Mayo
published
3.68
3.59
Terry Olerich
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.55
Hilda Sabelstrom
published
Christine Butler
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Catherine McWhorter + Renee Crisler5052% games−4.8% vs expected
Terry Olerich + Elizabeth Mayo134 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Terry Olerich033 matchesnot enough data
Hilda Sabelstrom + Renee Crisler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
April Falk
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
Renee Crisler
15W–5L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.76
Elizabeth Mayo
23W–20L career · no lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
4
Catherine McWhorter
8W–2L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.68
4
Terry Olerich
22W–29L career · 5 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
Hilda Sabelstrom
5W–19L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
Christine Butler
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.