Teams

CSRC LANGE

2023 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

9 players · average NTRP 3.75 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-05-22vs MEMPK GORTHYLost 02
L#2 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Leanne Thompson vs Stefanie McCarron / JESSEE BARLOW0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Noriko Moody4-6, 0-6
2023-05-19vs CCW FALKSplit 11
W#2 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Vincenta van Every vs Hilda Sabelstrom / Susan Turner7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Genevieve Berning3-6, 1-6
2023-05-15vs FLYHS LEVKUSLost 01
L#3 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Candace McCollett vs Catherine Mast / Melissa Morino7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-08vs CCW FALKLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeanne Thompson / DARLENE WARMOUTH vs April Falk / Wendy Jones1-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesCandace McCollett vs Genevieve Berning2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Wilklow / Patty Carpenter vs Elizabeth Mayo / Sonia Garrison7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-01vs LTFCS KALTENBACHERLost 01
L#1 DoublesDARLENE WARMOUTH / Leanne Thompson vs Salome D'Silva / Cindy Yetter6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-04-17vs MEMPK GORTHYWon 10
W#2 DoublesLeanne Thompson / DARLENE WARMOUTH vs Nancy Barker / Stefanie McCarron3-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 4.0 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.72
Leanne Thompson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.71
Patty Carpenter
published
3.66
Candace McCollett
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.46
Susan Wilklow
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.31
Vincenta van Every
published
DARLENE WARMOUTH
published 3.5
Jennifer Kapitan
published
Kristen Lange
published
Sandra Cook
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Wilklow + Leanne Thompson134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Leanne Thompson
95W–110L career · 4 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.72
Patty Carpenter
18W–19L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Candace McCollett
58W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.66
3.5
Susan Wilklow
18W–37L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Vincenta van Every
18W–15L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.31
3.5
DARLENE WARMOUTH
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jennifer Kapitan
16W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kristen Lange
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Cook
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.