Teams

Barnes, Darryl

2024 Team Singles-JXN · Women 2.5

7 players · average NTRP 3.25 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-12-22vs Shukla, LindseyWon 21
W#1 SinglesEllie Boutot vs Lindsey Shukla6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRobynne Shields vs Darrilyn Mitchell6-4, 6-4
L#3 SinglesBRITTANY MORALES vs Jordan Bryan3-6, 4-6
2024-12-17vs Barnard, OliviaLost 12
L#1 SinglesKari Thomas vs Amanda Carter6-7, 3-6
L#2 SinglesRobynne Shields vs Olivia Barnard6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 SinglesEllie Boutot vs Winky Newman6-0, 6-1
2024-11-21vs Wiygul, RachelWon 21
W#1 SinglesKari Thomas vs Conner Beth Ball7-6, 6-2
L#2 SinglesTemekia Jackson vs Alexia Sykes5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesRobynne Shields vs Rachel Wiygul6-3, 6-2
2024-11-17vs Bamzai, VidhiWon 30
W#1 SinglesTemekia Jackson vs Kelli Ford6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesKari Thomas vs Kym Gore6-1, 6-3
W#3 SinglesBRITTANY MORALES vs Amy Dixon7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2024-11-03vs Taylor, AlyssaWon 21
L#1 SinglesRobynne Shields vs Jennifer Vaughn0-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTemekia Jackson vs Kamryn Lantz6-3, 6-1
W#3 SinglesKari Thomas vs Alyssa Taylor6-4, 6-4
2024-10-27vs Price, KimWon 21
W#1 SinglesRobynne Shields vs Angie Pletzke6-2, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesKari Thomas vs Sherry Bouldin6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesBRITTANY MORALES vs Kim Price4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.80 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.16
Darryl Barnes
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Ellie Boutot
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.86
Kari Thomas
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #2 Singles 40% · published
2.75
BRITTANY MORALES
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.63
Gabrielle Banks
published
2.60
Temekia Jackson
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Robynne Shields
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robynne Shields + Temekia Jackson6455% games+3.0% vs expected
Kari Thomas + Gabrielle Banks303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Darryl Barnes
56W–52L career · 3 lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.16
Ellie Boutot
45W–20L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%28%72%
3.08
Kari Thomas
66W–23L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%1%99%
2.86
3
BRITTANY MORALES
32W–10L career · 3 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Gabrielle Banks
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
18%82%<1%
2.63
Temekia Jackson
39W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%25%75%
2.60
Robynne Shields
20W–16L career · 5 lines in 2024
0%32%68%
2.57

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.