Teams

Centercourt Florham Park 2

2022 18&over Women Day Winter · 4.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.80 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-10vs NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesMelissa McCarthy / Liza Cohn vs Tanya Tomao / Laura McCracken3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDiana Polk / Joan Perricone vs Lisa Maddox / Kelly Miller6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeather Willis / Rocio Aliaga Yermack vs Heather Shannon / Olga Carey2-6, 0-6
2022-03-03vs WarrenSplit 22
L#1 DoublesJennifer Abuhoff / Liza Cohn vs Helen Liu / Yoonhee Kang1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Wolff vs Sue Pangis6-3, 5-3
L#2 DoublesMelissa McCarthy / Corinne Chakhtoura vs Kristine Phillips / Laura Fiske4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesAllison Oishi / Joan Perricone vs Bonnie Frey / June Zimmerman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-24vs RandolphWon 30
W#1 DoublesLiza Cohn / Jennifer Abuhoff vs Kim Clay / Kathy Hargens6-4, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLynn Murphy / Heather Willis vs Kate Seaman / Liane van Etten7-5, 6-1
W#3 DoublesDiana Polk / Rocio Aliaga Yermack vs Yi-Fan Hu / Kristi Linz6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-02-17vs Chester 4.0Won 40
W#1 DoublesJennifer Abuhoff / Liza Cohn vs Kate Annen / Michelle Oates6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Rachel Lightman6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLaura Gelman / Sarah Spagnola Young vs Allison Kimmich / Sonya Wenz-Spoor6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesHeather Willis / Claire Garland vs Lisa Braumann / Dori Murphy4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2022-02-10vs Centercourt Florham Park 1Won 31
L#1 DoublesSylvia Rickert / Lauren Wolff vs Lindsay Cuffaro / Trudy Cederqvist4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Lia Martirossian6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesDiana Polk / Joan Perricone vs Alison Siebold / Kristin Krongard7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLynn Murphy / Corinne Chakhtoura vs Deborah Schoenblum / Rachel Calveric6-4, 6-3
2022-02-03vs Chester TennisLost 13
L#1 DoublesJennifer Abuhoff / Liza Cohn vs Amy Hearn / Joanna Goldin0-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Wolff vs Manju Adusumilli6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesLynn Murphy / Diana Polk vs Maritza Dominguez / Cherie Rygh0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesClaire Garland / Heather Willis vs Randi Volk / Jayamadhuri Ghosh0-6, 4-6
2022-01-27vs StrandLost 13
L#1 DoublesLauren Wolff / Sylvia Rickert vs Carol Mader / Kimberly Derr0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Lisa Sottung6-4, 2-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLiza Cohn / Valerie Edelson Smith vs Christine Hegan / Daniela Dumitru-Buna1-6, 5-6
L#3 DoublesRocio Aliaga Yermack / Joan Perricone vs Cindy Fass / Jennifer Bu6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2022-01-20vs Murray HillLost 13
L#1 DoublesDiana Polk / Lauren Wolff vs Elizabeth Clark / Kristen Segal2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Jaime Schechter7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeather Willis / Lynn Murphy vs Carol Soos / Corinne Thomas5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSarah Spagnola Young / Laura Gelman vs Lisa Baird / Kerry O'Hearen6-4, 6-1
2022-01-13vs Centercourt ChathamLost 13
L#1 DoublesLiza Cohn / Jennifer Abuhoff vs Margaret Haughey / Chung Winstanley5-7, 4-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesMelissa McCarthy vs Sunny Wallin5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDiana Polk / Sylvia Rickert vs Suzanne Loughrey / Randi Sellinger1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCorinne Chakhtoura / Lynn Murphy vs Margot Small / Emily Won7-6, 5-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Centercourt Chatham102331536325
2Randolph93301845358
3Courtside 284341435337
4Centercourt Florham Park 184321643376
5Unmatchable Chester84252348390
6Racquet Tappers75321639378
7Crestmont66222658434
8Perfect Match47202457427
9Murray Hill48163270478
10Centercourt Florham Park 2110103469469
11Centercourt Chatham 2#000000
12Fairfield01053572462

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.84
Melissa McCarthy
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
3.79
Allison Oishi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Corinne Chakhtoura
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4
3.48
Joan Perricone
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
Claire Garland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.37
Lynn Murphy
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published
3.32
Sheila Deguines
published
Diana Polk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
2.87
Heather Willis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
Jennifer Abuhoff
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Laura Gelman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
Lauren Wolff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
Liza Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
Rocio Aliaga Yermack
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Sarah Spagnola Young
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Sylvia Rickert
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Valerie Edelson Smith
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lynn Murphy + Heather Willis4355% games+15.7% vs expected
Lynn Murphy + Corinne Chakhtoura7159% games+12.4% vs expected
Lynn Murphy + Claire Garland4356% games+7.2% vs expected
Lauren Wolff + Corinne Chakhtoura5159% games+5.4% vs expected
Heather Willis + Claire Garland201454% games+4.8% vs expected
Rocio Aliaga Yermack + Lynn Murphy9753% games+2.2% vs expected
Sarah Spagnola Young + Laura Gelman16853% games+1.4% vs expected
Corinne Chakhtoura + Allison Oishi8754% games−2.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Melissa McCarthy
114W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.84
4
Allison Oishi
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2022
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Corinne Chakhtoura
71W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Joan Perricone
78W–69L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.48
3.5
Claire Garland
51W–36L career · 6 lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.46
Lynn Murphy
46W–50L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
Sheila Deguines
135W–50L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Diana Polk
46W–41L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Heather Willis
55W–47L career · 5 lines in 2022
>99%<1%0%
2.87
Jennifer Abuhoff
17W–27L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Gelman
19W–15L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Wolff
78W–35L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liza Cohn
13W–26L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rocio Aliaga Yermack
42W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sarah Spagnola Young
31W–19L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sylvia Rickert
20W–36L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Valerie Edelson Smith
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.