Teams

Centercourt Florham Park 1

2022 18&over Women Day Winter · 4.0

16 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NEW JERSEY REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-03-10vs Centercourt ChathamLost 12
L#1 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Suzanne Loughrey / Sally Allen0-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Rooney / Janet Haus vs Michelle Melnick / Karen Bisk6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSARAH PLEVINSKY / Lia Martirossian vs Margot Small / Emi Chalker3-6, 2-6
2022-03-03vs Chester TennisLost 03
L#1 DoublesDee Fabijanic / Rachel Calveric vs Joanna Goldin / Amy Hearn2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesLori Iulo / Jayne Hanley vs Cherie Rygh / Maritza Dominguez1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKaren Rooney / Jennifer Schipper vs Erika Schmitt / Margaret Timoney0-6, 1-6
2022-02-24vs StrandLost 04
L#1 DoublesLori Iulo / Jayne Hanley vs Kimberly Derr / Carol Mader3-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Schipper vs Lisa Sottung4-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKathryn Viggiano / Kristin Krongard vs Christine Hegan / Maria Vitale2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Daniela Dumitru-Buna / Sung Jost Ioffredo2-6, 4-6
2022-02-17vs Murray HillLost 13
W#1 DoublesDee Fabijanic / Rachel Calveric vs Kate Hunzinger / Alexandra Walter3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLia Martirossian vs Jaime Schechter3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKaren Rooney / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Jill Zimmermann / Carol Jee7-6, 2-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / SARAH PLEVINSKY vs Corinne Thomas / Jodi Burns7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-10vs Centercourt Florham Park 2Lost 13
W#1 DoublesLindsay Cuffaro / Trudy Cederqvist vs Sylvia Rickert / Lauren Wolff6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesLia Martirossian vs Melissa McCarthy2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAlison Siebold / Kristin Krongard vs Diana Polk / Joan Perricone6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDeborah Schoenblum / Rachel Calveric vs Lynn Murphy / Corinne Chakhtoura4-6, 3-6
2022-02-03vs NassauWon 21
W#1 DoublesDee Fabijanic / Rachel Calveric vs Monique Allen / Liz Christian6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJanet Haus / Alison Siebold vs Olga Carey / Heather Shannon3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKathryn Viggiano / Karen Rooney vs Margaret Seitter / Sosi Balian7-6, 1-6, 1-0
2022-01-27vs WarrenWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlison Siebold / Janet Haus vs JANE LAI / Helen Liu6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDeborah Schoenblum vs Laura Fiske4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Calveric / Lori Iulo vs Kristine Phillips / Jennifer Bona6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Lindsay Cuffaro vs June Zimmerman / Bonnie Frey6-7, 5-3, 1-0
2022-01-20vs RandolphWon 21
L#1 DoublesDee Fabijanic / Kathryn Viggiano vs Janet Gillespie / Kathleen Kavanaugh4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesRachel Calveric / Karen Rooney vs Jennifer Lai / Kristi Linz6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTrudy Cederqvist / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Liane van Etten / Janet Himstead6-0, 6-2
2022-01-13vs Chester 4.0Won 30
W#1 DoublesLori Iulo / Jayne Hanley vs Janet Reiman-Auriemma / Vassie Ware7-5, 5-0
W#2 DoublesDee Fabijanic / Lindsay Cuffaro vs Dori Murphy / Rachel Lightman6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKristin Krongard / Alison Siebold vs RSonia Waldman / Brenda Curnin6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings12 teams · 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Centercourt Chatham102331536325
2Randolph93301845358
3Courtside 284341435337
4Centercourt Florham Park 184321643376
5Unmatchable Chester84252348390
6Racquet Tappers75321639378
7Crestmont66222658434
8Perfect Match47202457427
9Murray Hill48163270478
10Centercourt Florham Park 2110103469469
11Centercourt Chatham 2#000000
12Fairfield01053572462

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.58 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Janet Haus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.76
Dee Fabijanic
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.71
JACLYN STEIN
published 4
3.56
Kathryn Viggiano
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.55
Alison Siebold
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Karen Rooney
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Jayne Hanley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.39
Lindsay Cuffaro
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Deborah Schoenblum
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jennifer Schipper
usually #1 Singles 36%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published
Kristin Krongard
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lia Martirossian
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Lori Iulo
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Rachel Calveric
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
SARAH PLEVINSKY
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Trudy Cederqvist
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dee Fabijanic + Rachel Calveric14259% games+9.7% vs expected
Kathryn Viggiano + Kristin Krongard2349% games+5.1% vs expected
Lindsay Cuffaro + Trudy Cederqvist241259% games+4.5% vs expected
Kathryn Viggiano + Karen Rooney13851% games+3.4% vs expected
Kathryn Viggiano + Jayne Hanley7552% games+0.9% vs expected
Janet Haus + Alison Siebold5554% games+0.9% vs expected
Rachel Calveric + Kristin Krongard12951% games−0.1% vs expected
Janet Haus + Dee Fabijanic5850% games−1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janet Haus
35W–28L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
4
Dee Fabijanic
70W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
4
JACLYN STEIN
32W–30L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.71
Kathryn Viggiano
45W–52L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%32%68%
3.56
4
Alison Siebold
71W–65L career · 4 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55
Karen Rooney
38W–64L career · 5 lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
3.47
Jayne Hanley
43W–48L career · 3 lines in 2022
77%23%<1%
3.40
Lindsay Cuffaro
113W–47L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
3.39
Deborah Schoenblum
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jennifer Schipper
27W–39L career · 11 lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Krongard
49W–47L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lia Martirossian
11W–14L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Lori Iulo
17W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rachel Calveric
40W–16L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
SARAH PLEVINSKY
7W–23L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Trudy Cederqvist
106W–53L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.