Teams

Pelican Bay Park- Flegel

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesSindi Sanzica / Anne Mortillaro vs Young McMurry / Dayna Webre3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Terry Dirr vs Amy Gardner / Tracy Stuben6-4, 6-1
2020-12-07vs Marco YMCA - WashakLost 02
L#1 DoublesCarole Flegel / Sindi Sanzica vs Karen Huffman / Stacy Faremouth4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Mortillaro / Tasha Christiansen vs Brita Swanson / Stephanie Opel6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2020-11-30vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 10
W#2 DoublesLisa Ruffolo / Terry Dirr vs Lauren Keillor / Julie Mans6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Lisa Ruffolo vs Nancy Harbert / Karyn Sardar0-6, 1-6
2020-10-29vs Marco YMCA - WashakWon 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Michelle Suppes vs Brita Swanson / Lynne Huggins4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2020-10-12vs Pelican Bay Park - WongLost 01
L#1 DoublesMichele Nelson-Baker / Terry Dirr vs Diana Wong / Shelly Ficarra6-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Terry Dirr
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Barbara Dovin
published 4
Carole Flegel
published 4
3.73
Michele Nelson-Baker
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.50
Sindi Sanzica
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Anne Mortillaro
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Lisa Ruffolo
published
Vesna Petrovic
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Nelson-Baker + Terry Dirr141253% games+3.4% vs expected
Terry Dirr + Sindi Sanzica224 matchesnot enough data
Michele Nelson-Baker + Sindi Sanzica033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Terry Dirr
323W–169L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Barbara Dovin
7W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Carole Flegel
5W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michele Nelson-Baker
94W–98L career · 4 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
Sindi Sanzica
104W–135L career · 2 lines in 2021
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Anne Mortillaro
36W–66L career · 2 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.43
Lisa Ruffolo
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vesna Petrovic
16W–9L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.