Teams

Pelican Bay Park - Wong

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.80 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2020-12-14vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 01
L#2 DoublesAlicia Rosa / Ashley Hayes vs Mia Delk / Wendy Garber2-6, 3-6
2020-11-30vs Olde Cypress - NavarroLost 01
L#2 DoublesAmber Hill / Nora Slusar vs Beth Rainey / Lori Caple3-6, 3-6
2020-11-25vs Pelican Marsh - BargerWon 10
W#2 DoublesCorey Stranger / Catherine Elkins vs Sunny Barger / Brenda Rhoda6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAlicia Rosa / Nora Slusar vs Dayna Webre / Marie Shoaf5-7, 2-6
2020-10-19vs Olde Cypress - NavarroSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Wong / Alicia Rosa vs Minde Shinnick / Karey Hogan7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Hayes / Amber Hill vs Lori Caple / Cheryl Toth7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.26
Diana Wong
published 4.5
3.71
Shae Rohling
published
3.53
Amber Hill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Rachael Klaas
published
3.32
Ashley Buehler
published 3.5
Alicia Rosa
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Nora Slusar
published
3.16
Corey Stranger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Kari Gustafson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Corey Stranger + Alicia Rosa8849% gamesnot enough data
Amber Hill + Corey Stranger2450% gamesnot enough data
Corey Stranger + Nora Slusar123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Diana Wong
15W–7L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.26
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · no lines in 2021
5%93%1%
3.71
4
Amber Hill
79W–160L career · 2 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
3.53
Rachael Klaas
4W–23L career · no lines in 2021
52%48%<1%
3.49
3.5
Ashley Buehler
2W–5L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Alicia Rosa
48W–66L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Nora Slusar
17W–10L career · no lines in 2021
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Corey Stranger
223W–172L career · 2 lines in 2021
11%88%<1%
3.16
Kari Gustafson
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.