Teams

Olde Cypress - Navarro

2021 Collier Adult 18 & Over Fall · Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2020-12-07vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Karey Hogan vs Kimberly Davey / Lisa Gosney3-6, 6-7
2020-11-30vs Pelican Bay Park - WongSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Karey Hogan vs Shae Rohling / Alexandra Fast2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBeth Rainey / Lori Caple vs Amber Hill / Nora Slusar6-3, 6-3
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Karey Hogan vs Margaret Werchek / Tracy Stuben6-3, 7-5
2020-11-19vs Pelican Bay Park - DelkLost 01
L#1 DoublesKarey Hogan / Lori Caple vs Ann Heinauer / Wendy Garber6-3, 6-7, 0-1
2020-11-16vs Pelican Bay Park- FlegelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesCheryl Toth / Lori Caple vs Sherry Newland / Barbara Dovin1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Minde Shinnick vs Catherine Barsky / Trish Erickson6-7, 7-5, 1-0
2020-11-02vs Pelican Marsh - BargerLost 02
L#1 DoublesLori Caple / Cheryl Toth vs Kristen Catino / Shelley Boggess2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKarey Hogan / Beth Rainey vs Lauren Keillor / Julie Mans5-7, 3-6
2020-10-26vs Marco YMCA - WashakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Karey Hogan vs Karen Huffman / Rachel Schenk0-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesLori Caple / Cheryl Toth vs Marzenna Nowak / Lynne Huggins6-3, 3-6, 1-0
2020-10-19vs Pelican Bay Park - WongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMinde Shinnick / Karey Hogan vs Diana Wong / Alicia Rosa5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLori Caple / Cheryl Toth vs Ashley Hayes / Amber Hill5-7, 6-2, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 18 & Over 4.0 -Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.77
Minde Shinnick
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
3.73
Karey Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.65
Lori Caple
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Beth Rainey
published 3.5
3.48
Melody Miller
published
3.36
Susanne Navarro
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karey Hogan + Susanne Navarro8946% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Karey Hogan4943% gamesnot enough data
Karey Hogan + Lori Caple6452% gamesnot enough data
Susanne Navarro + Lori Caple5350% gamesnot enough data
Minde Shinnick + Lori Caple123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Minde Shinnick
119W–115L career · 6 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.77
Karey Hogan
91W–110L career · 8 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Lori Caple
130W–93L career · 6 lines in 2021
12%87%<1%
3.65
3.5
Beth Rainey
16W–13L career · no lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
Melody Miller
31W–11L career · no lines in 2021
<1%55%45%
3.48
Susanne Navarro
229W–208L career · no lines in 2021
<1%86%14%
3.36

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.