Teams

Bell tri level

2026 TriLevel 18&over-NE · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-11vs Holley TrilevelWon 20
W#2 DoublesBrent Waldrop / Joseph Summers vs Kevin Abel / Shane Harrington6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesGary Russell / Jacob Reese vs Dillon Turner / Mark Taylor2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-08-06vs Lindsey trilevelLost 01
L#1 DoublesRay Bell / Steven Gilliland vs Carl Ballard / John Benjamin7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2026-08-03vs Holley TrilevelLost 01
L#3 DoublesDrew Clement / Brent Waldrop vs Mark Taylor / Dillon Turner1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2026-07-23vs Holley TrilevelWon 20
W#2 DoublesSteven Gilliland / Justin Waldrop vs Shane Harrington / Kevin Abel6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Hightower / Gary Russell vs Dillon Turner / Paul Perry7-6, 7-6
2026-07-16vs Lindsey trilevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesRay Bell / Steven Gilliland vs James Roberts / Christopher Davis6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Joseph Summers vs Brian Quinn / Randy Talley7-6, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDrew Clement / Gary Russell vs Blake Kennedy / John Gatlin2-6, 3-6
2026-06-25vs Lindsey trilevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesRay Bell / NEIL ALFORD vs James Roberts / Christopher Davis6-1, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJustin Waldrop / Joseph Summers vs Jamie Lindsey / Michael Duncan6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGary Russell / Robert Hightower vs Brent Conwill / Blake Kennedy3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bell tri level5112617139
2Lindsey trilevel4211717149
3Holley Trilevel0641430190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Justin Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Steven Gilliland
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Ray Bell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Jacob Reese
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Brent Waldrop
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Gary Russell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Drew Clement
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Robert Hightower
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
NEIL ALFORD
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Justin Waldrop
14W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%58%42%
3.98
Steven Gilliland
10W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%12%88%
3.65
Ray Bell
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.63
3.5
Jacob Reese
11W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%49%51%
3.50
3.5
Brent Waldrop
20W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
3.43
3.5
Gary Russell
37W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Drew Clement
6W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
Robert Hightower
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
3.09
NEIL ALFORD
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.