Teams

Lindsey trilevel

2026 TriLevel 18&over-NE · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5

9 players · average NTRP 3.90 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-06vs Bell tri levelWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarl Ballard / John Benjamin vs Ray Bell / Steven Gilliland5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-08-04vs Holley TrilevelSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJohn Benjamin / Randy Talley vs Shane Harrington / Kevin Abel7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Conwill / Julian Cunningham vs Mark Taylor / James Bracken2-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-30vs Holley TrilevelWon 30
W#1 DoublesCarl Ballard / James Roberts vs Adam Holley / Kevin Abel6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Duncan / Randy Talley vs Dalton Teeple / Shane Harrington6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBrent Conwill / Blake Kennedy vs Dillon Turner / James Bracken6-3, 6-2
2026-07-16vs Bell tri levelSplit 11
L#2 DoublesBrian Quinn / Randy Talley vs Justin Waldrop / Joseph Summers6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBlake Kennedy / John Gatlin vs Drew Clement / Gary Russell6-2, 6-3
2026-07-09vs Holley TrilevelWon 21
W#1 DoublesCarl Ballard / James Roberts vs Adam Holley / Christopher Shands6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesBrian Quinn / John Benjamin vs Shane Harrington / Kevin Abel3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesBrent Conwill / Julian Cunningham vs Dillon Turner / James Bracken6-3, 7-6
2026-06-25vs Bell tri levelSplit 11
L#2 DoublesJamie Lindsey / Michael Duncan vs Justin Waldrop / Joseph Summers7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBrent Conwill / Blake Kennedy vs Gary Russell / Robert Hightower6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · Men 3.5, 4.0, 4.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Bell tri level5112617139
2Lindsey trilevel4211717149
3Holley Trilevel0641430190

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Carl Ballard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.80
Brian Quinn
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
John Benjamin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.61
Jamie Lindsey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Michael Duncan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.43
Blake Kennedy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Brent Conwill
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.32
John Gatlin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Julian Cunningham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Carl Ballard
3W–0L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
4
Brian Quinn
20W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
3.80
John Benjamin
15W–13L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Jamie Lindsey
21W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.61
Michael Duncan
32W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
3.49
3.5
Blake Kennedy
40W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%69%31%
3.43
3.5
Brent Conwill
8W–2L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
John Gatlin
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
1%91%8%
3.32
Julian Cunningham
11W–18L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.