Teams

Vander Dussen

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Ladies

15 players · average NTRP 3.40 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-22vs DyslinLost 05
L#1 DoublesLiana Proffer / Kate Snead vs Lisa Brack / Danyell Dyslin3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Artho vs Anastacia Nix4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesKelsey Vander Dussen / Betsy Kelley vs Chandra Short / Deborah Walterscheid4-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesMeaghan Collier vs Magda Arreola1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJessica Headrick / Brittan Peterson vs Kinsley Stepka / Brooke Walterscheid1-6, 3-6
2026-06-15vs HammondWon 50
W#1 DoublesBetsy Kelley / Meaghan Collier vs Sridevi Veeramachaneni / Cori Burns6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesGainor Davis vs Payton Drew7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKate Snead / Ashley Kelley vs Deann Morrison / Charmone Prescott6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesCali Crump vs Bridget Bednarz6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMolly Caviness / Brittan Peterson vs Mary Jane Hammond / Ana Maria Ranone4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-06-09vs HammondWon 31
W#1 DoublesMolly Caviness / Ashley Kelley vs Erica Stansbury / Ana Maria Ranone6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesGainor Davis vs Cori Burns6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesLiana Proffer / Meaghan Collier vs Deann Morrison / Payton Drew6-3, 7-6
L#2 SinglesBrittan Peterson vs Mary Jane Hammond6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-06-08vs HusemanWon 32
L#1 DoublesKate Snead / Cali Crump vs Elizabeth Huseman / Khin Lwin5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Artho vs Caroline Huseman6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMeaghan Collier / Betsy Kelley vs Allison Manchee / Tessa Aragon2-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesSloane Ware vs Jennifer Woolsey1-0
W#3 DoublesKelsey Vander Dussen / Jessica Headrick vs Secia Roberts / Melody Garrido6-4, 6-0
2026-06-01vs DyslinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesGainor Davis / Ashley Kelley vs Anastacia Nix / Magda Arreola1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesCaroline Artho vs Danyell Dyslin6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesBrittan Peterson / Molly Caviness vs Alisa McFarden / Lisa Brack1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesSloane Ware vs Brooke Walterscheid6-1, 6-2
2026-05-11vs HusemanLost 14
L#1 DoublesJessica Headrick / Meaghan Collier vs Julian Huseman / Caroline Huseman2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesGainor Davis vs Khin Lwin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesCali Crump / Molly Caviness vs Claudia Aragon / Jennifer Woolsey7-5, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBrittan Peterson vs Michele Fant6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesKelsey Vander Dussen / Kathleen Kritser vs Tessa Aragon / Secia Roberts1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Dyslin42181227234
2Vander Dussen33141633261

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.78
Sloane Ware
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.60
Cali Crump
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.53
Caroline Artho
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Kate Snead
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.42
Betsy Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.40
Liana Proffer
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.38
Gainor Davis
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.36
Kathleen Kritser
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.35
Meaghan Collier
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.29
Ashley Kelley
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.27
Molly Caviness
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Kelsey Vander Dussen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Brittan Peterson
usually #2 Singles 22%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.64
Jessica Headrick
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rachelle Tuls
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kate Snead + Ashley Kelley123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sloane Ware
11W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.78
3.5
Cali Crump
4W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.60
Caroline Artho
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%40%60%
3.53
Kate Snead
8W–6L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Betsy Kelley
6W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%74%26%
3.42
Liana Proffer
7W–7L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.40
3.5
Gainor Davis
8W–12L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
Kathleen Kritser
6W–7L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%86%14%
3.36
Meaghan Collier
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%86%13%
3.35
3.5
Ashley Kelley
2W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.29
Molly Caviness
7W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
3.27
Kelsey Vander Dussen
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
10%90%1%
3.17
3
Brittan Peterson
12W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%41%59%
3.03
Jessica Headrick
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.64
Rachelle Tuls
2W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.