Teams

Huseman

2026 USTA Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Ladies

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-22vs HammondWon 50
W#1 DoublesJulian Huseman / Allison Manchee vs Bridget Bednarz / Payton Drew6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesCaroline Huseman vs Sridevi Veeramachaneni6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Elizabeth Huseman vs Denise Leard / Shelley Matos6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesMichele Fant vs Mary Jane Hammond2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMelody Garrido / Secia Roberts vs Kaci Bohn / Charmone Prescott6-4, 6-1
2026-06-15vs DyslinWon 41
W#1 DoublesKhin Lwin / Caroline Huseman vs Magda Arreola / Alisa McFarden6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJulian Huseman vs Kinsley Stepka6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAllison Manchee / Elizabeth Huseman vs Lisa Brack / Shelby Lowe2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSecia Roberts vs Deborah Walterscheid4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Tessa Aragon vs Danyell Dyslin / Kimberly Roberts6-1, 6-3
2026-06-08vs Vander DussenLost 23
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Huseman / Khin Lwin vs Kate Snead / Cali Crump7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesCaroline Huseman vs Caroline Artho3-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesAllison Manchee / Tessa Aragon vs Meaghan Collier / Betsy Kelley6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJennifer Woolsey vs Sloane Ware0-1
L#3 DoublesSecia Roberts / Melody Garrido vs Kelsey Vander Dussen / Jessica Headrick4-6, 0-6
2026-06-01vs HammondWon 41
W#1 DoublesJulian Huseman / Allison Manchee vs Erica Stansbury / Shelley Matos6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKhin Lwin vs Mary Jane Hammond6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Secia Roberts vs Laresa Chesley / Kaci Bohn6-4, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTessa Aragon vs Deann Morrison6-1, 6-0
L#3 DoublesMelody Garrido / Jennifer Woolsey vs Payton Drew / Ana Maria Ranone3-6, 0-6
2026-05-25vs DyslinWon 31
W#1 DoublesKhin Lwin / Caroline Huseman vs Lisa Brack / Magda Arreola6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesElizabeth Huseman vs Kinsley Stepka7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllison Manchee / Tessa Aragon vs Deborah Walterscheid / Brooke Walterscheid6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Melody Garrido vs Danyell Dyslin / Kimberly Roberts2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-11vs Vander DussenWon 41
W#1 DoublesJulian Huseman / Caroline Huseman vs Jessica Headrick / Meaghan Collier6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesKhin Lwin vs Gainor Davis6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesClaudia Aragon / Jennifer Woolsey vs Cali Crump / Molly Caviness5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichele Fant vs Brittan Peterson7-6, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTessa Aragon / Secia Roberts vs Kelsey Vander Dussen / Kathleen Kritser6-1, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.42 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Khin Lwin
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #1 Singles 22% · published
3.69
Julian Huseman
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.62
Claudia Aragon
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.59
Caroline Huseman
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.57
Elizabeth Huseman
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.52
Secia Roberts
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.51
Allison Manchee
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.27
Tessa Aragon
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 22% · published
3.10
Michele Fant
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.03
Jennifer Woolsey
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.00
Melody Garrido
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julian Huseman + Caroline Huseman11354% games+7.6% vs expected
Caroline Huseman + Elizabeth Huseman123 matchesnot enough data
Jennifer Woolsey + Claudia Aragon033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Khin Lwin
22W–13L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.71
Julian Huseman
24W–9L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.69
3.5
Claudia Aragon
12W–19L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%21%79%
3.62
3.5
Caroline Huseman
20W–15L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%26%74%
3.59
Elizabeth Huseman
11W–8L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
Secia Roberts
4W–12L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.52
3.5
Allison Manchee
5W–0L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
Tessa Aragon
17W–6L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%3%97%
3.27
Michele Fant
3W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Jennifer Woolsey
12W–15L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Melody Garrido
7W–14L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.00

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.