Teams

KY/LEX/Coy

2026 USTA TRI-LEVEL 18 & OVER LEXINGTON · 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.33 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-05-30vs KY/LEX/Walker/AlbrechtLost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Rogier / Amy Worthington Johnson vs Sophie Schmidt / Patti Stanton7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoriko Hosoda / Katelyn Meckes vs Amy Johns / Taylor Wilcox2-6, 2-6
2026-05-29vs KY/LEX/Walker/AlbrechtLost 12
W#1 DoublesAmy Worthington Johnson / Paige Bensing vs Emily Pernice / Sophie Schmidt6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesNoriko Hosoda / Katelyn Meckes vs Ann Albrecht / Lee Ann Sheehy6-2, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSidney Boots / Julia Rhorer vs Allyson Foster / Lindsey Quijano3-6, 1-6
2026-05-16vs KY/LEX/Walker/AlbrechtWon 21
W#1 DoublesEmily Diehl / Paige Bensing vs Sophie Schmidt / Patti Stanton6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKatelyn Meckes / Amber Brown vs April Russell / Lee Ann Sheehy6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulia Rhorer / Laura Moffett vs Allyson Foster / Amanda Fredericks4-6, 4-6
2026-05-16vs KY/LEX/Humbert/Pernice/AlbrechtLost 03
L#1 DoublesPaige Bensing / Amy Worthington Johnson vs Emily Pernice / Elizabeth Bell7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesYucong Sang / Lachley Bensing vs April Russell / Taylor Wilcox5-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Moffett / Sidney Boots vs Niki Moss / Miho Stepka2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-05-15vs KY/LEX/Walker/AlbrechtLost 12
W#1 DoublesJanine Coy / Lauren Kruger vs Elizabeth Bell / Allison Overstreet6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKatelyn Meckes / Yucong Sang vs Lee Walker / Miho Stepka6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSarah Watts / Laura Moffett vs Lindsey Quijano / Niki Moss1-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5, 3.0, 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Emily Diehl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Janine Coy
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Lauren Kruger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Paige Bensing
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Amy Worthington Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Lachley Bensing
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Amy Rogier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.13
Amber Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Katelyn Meckes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Sidney Boots
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Julia Rhorer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Yucong Sang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Laura Moffett
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Noriko Hosoda
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
1.85
Sarah Watts
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Diehl + Amber Brown5164% games+19.6% vs expected
Paige Bensing + Janine Coy3256% games+2.6% vs expected
Emily Diehl + Janine Coy224 matchesnot enough data
Paige Bensing + Emily Diehl303 matchesnot enough data
Katelyn Meckes + Noriko Hosoda033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
Janine Coy
64W–32L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%77%22%
3.39
Lauren Kruger
12W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Paige Bensing
43W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Amy Worthington Johnson
22W–28L career · 3 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.25
Lachley Bensing
0W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Amy Rogier
12W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Amber Brown
26W–11L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%18%82%
3.13
Katelyn Meckes
22W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Sidney Boots
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.88
Julia Rhorer
0W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.70
Yucong Sang
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Laura Moffett
10W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
Noriko Hosoda
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2026
98%2%<1%
2.23
Sarah Watts
0W–12L career · 1 line in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.85

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.