Teams

V - WAC Ace Kickers

2022 USTA Adult 18 &Over - WD Ventura · Ventura - Women 4.0 WD

13 players · average NTRP 3.89 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 WD have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Tanja Daniel
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #1 Singles 13% · published 4
3.78
Lori Constan
published
3.78
Melissa Sherline
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.70
Nooshin Samadani
usually #1 Singles 89%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4
3.67
Debra Hair
published 4
3.64
Ramona Halloran
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.63
Annie Farkas
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.62
Susan Wise
published
3.58
Sharon Heintz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.44
Frances Kharaghani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.40
Lisa Doan
published
3.30
Mary Conversano
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.96
Lesley Moverley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tanja Daniel + Melissa Sherline91151% games+1.8% vs expected
Tanja Daniel + Lisa Doan2341% games+0.6% vs expected
Ramona Halloran + Tanja Daniel182649% games−4.2% vs expected
Annie Farkas + Mary Conversano6649% gamesnot enough data
Annie Farkas + Sharon Heintz6164% gamesnot enough data
Lesley Moverley + Frances Kharaghani0629% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Sherline + Nooshin Samadani2443% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Sherline + Lisa Doan4250% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Tanja Daniel
148W–174L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.87
Lori Constan
5W–5L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.78
4
Melissa Sherline
115W–104L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.78
4
Nooshin Samadani
105W–102L career · 9 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Debra Hair
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ramona Halloran
90W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Annie Farkas
112W–106L career · 5 lines in 2022
15%85%<1%
3.63
Susan Wise
1W–3L career · no lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Sharon Heintz
54W–46L career · 9 lines in 2022
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Frances Kharaghani
93W–76L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%69%31%
3.44
Lisa Doan
5W–8L career · no lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
3.5
Mary Conversano
67W–89L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.30
Lesley Moverley
28W–53L career · 3 lines in 2022
64%36%<1%
2.96

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.