Teams

Cooper Fitness/Findley W4.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

20 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-27vs Greenhill/Perez-Kerr W4.5SSplit 11
L#1 SinglesRachel Fagan vs Anne Perez6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSarah Cannon / Laura Jacobi vs Rena Ramey / Sue Mowery6-2, 6-1
2024-10-20vs Kiest/Campbell W4.5SWon 10
W#1 DoublesSarah Cannon / Heather Dossett vs Brittany Lax / Stephanie Prats7-6, 6-4
2024-10-13vs Huffhines/Koller-Fletcher W4.5SWon 30
W#1 DoublesAubrey Findley / Laura Jacobi vs Heidi Paredes / Jennifer Spivey6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesClaire Stone / Rachel Fagan vs Amelia White / Julie Fetter6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Marroquin / Sarah Cannon vs Jana Whisenhunt / Gianna Cerullo6-2, 6-0
2024-10-06vs Greenhill/Asadidezfouli W4.5SWon 10
W#2 DoublesRachel Fagan / Alexandra Northington vs Lauren Peacock / Liza Ellis6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLinda Leftin / Alexandra Northington vs Hannah Walsh / Caryn Angus6-3, 6-2
2024-09-22vs Garland/Smith-Turck W4.5SSplit 11
W#1 DoublesLaura Jacobi / Natalie Stewart vs Alexandra Turck / Stella Nguyen Bezabeh6-4, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJoanna Leitch vs Alyssa Bauer1-6, 1-6
2024-09-08vs Greenhill/Ewing W4.5SWon 20
W#1 DoublesLaura Marroquin / Sarah Cannon vs Jennifer Hill / Renee Davidson6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTara Morgan / Natalie Stewart vs Rebecca Neal / Kate Chalupa6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.18 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Ashley Reaves
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4.5
4.44
Sarah Cannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.35
Melissa Walters
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.32
Livene Rose-Munoz
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published
4.27
Laura Jacobi
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.21
Alexandra Northington
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.20
Makiko Bass
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Aubrey Findley
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 21% · published 4.5
4.20
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published 4.5
4.17
Courtney Case
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.17
Vanessa Kelley
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
4.15
Tara Morgan
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
4.12
Ashli Urano
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.11
Heather Dossett
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.99
Laura Marroquin
usually #1 Doubles 55%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
3.97
Claire Stone
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.83
Natalie Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Joanna Leitch
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Linda Leftin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Rachel Fagan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Walters + Livene Rose-Munoz10557% games−3.9% vs expected
Courtney Case + Heather Dossett7450% games−4.6% vs expected
Aubrey Findley + Vanessa Kelley7947% games−6.6% vs expected
Aubrey Findley + Tara Morgan4261% gamesnot enough data
Melissa Walters + Vanessa Kelley404 matchesnot enough data
Ashley Reaves + Ashli Urano314 matchesnot enough data
Makiko Bass + Aubrey Findley224 matchesnot enough data
Aubrey Findley + Livene Rose-Munoz404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Reaves
49W–13L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
4.46
Sarah Cannon
12W–1L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
4.44
Melissa Walters
37W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
4.35
Livene Rose-Munoz
40W–16L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
Laura Jacobi
19W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Alexandra Northington
24W–13L career · 8 lines in 2025
5%94%1%
4.21
Makiko Bass
12W–6L career · 8 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Aubrey Findley
63W–34L career · 14 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
HIROE BLACKLEDGE
35W–27L career · 8 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
Courtney Case
12W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Vanessa Kelley
32W–21L career · 4 lines in 2025
10%89%<1%
4.17
Tara Morgan
29W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
12%87%<1%
4.15
4.5
Ashli Urano
22W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
4.12
4.5
Heather Dossett
9W–4L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
4.11
Laura Marroquin
36W–17L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%54%46%
3.99
4.5
Claire Stone
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.97
Natalie Stewart
14W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.83
Joanna Leitch
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Linda Leftin
3W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rachel Fagan
5W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.