Teams

Colleyville Park/Coffindaffer W4.5S

2025 DALLAS TENNIS N · A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday

23 players · average NTRP 4.17 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for A 18 & Over ADULT Fall W. Sunday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.78 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Areli Martinez
published 4.5
4.15
Rachel Pungwe
published 4.5
4.14
Kenda Bevill
published
4.07
Eugenia Viejobueno
published
3.98
Natalie Timothy
published
3.97
Caroline Baden
published 4.5
3.91
Thea Junt
published
3.90
Daniella Bowling
published 4
3.86
Christina Perron
published 4
3.82
Taylor Montesi
published
3.78
Courtney Shukis
published 4
3.76
3.73
Nidia Bridges
published
3.70
Leslie Eugenio
published
3.60
Caryn Angus
published 4
3.52
Cami Gorsky
published 4
3.31
Jane Poquiz
published
3.23
Laura Locke
published
3.19
Susan Huber
published
Hannah Walsh
published
Kalisha Lee
published
Meredith Weckel
published
Shannon Vivian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rachel Pungwe + Areli Martinez3442% games+1.6% vs expected
Daniella Bowling + Eugenia Viejobueno7074% gamesnot enough data
Christina Perron + Eugenia Viejobueno3253% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Areli Martinez
15W–14L career · no lines in 2025
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Rachel Pungwe
9W–15L career · no lines in 2025
15%85%1%
4.15
Kenda Bevill
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
4.14
Eugenia Viejobueno
38W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
4.07
Natalie Timothy
30W–28L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
4.5
Caroline Baden
17W–16L career · no lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.97
Thea Junt
43W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Daniella Bowling
11W–1L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.90
4
Christina Perron
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
1%84%16%
3.86
Taylor Montesi
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Courtney Shukis
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Jennifer Coffindaffer
127W–78L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
Nidia Bridges
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Leslie Eugenio
25W–26L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
4
Caryn Angus
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.60
4
Cami Gorsky
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
44%56%<1%
3.52
Jane Poquiz
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
3.31
Laura Locke
7W–22L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.23
Susan Huber
15W–25L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Hannah Walsh
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Kalisha Lee
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Meredith Weckel
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Vivian
12W–15L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.