Teams

Edwardson/Trevino

2022 MIXED 18 & OVER EARLY START · 7.0 MX

13 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-11-19vs KruseLost 01
L#2 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Lina Wang / Julian Hommeyer2-6, 3-6
2021-11-12vs Hultman/Ledray- Racq PackWon 10
W#3 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Angela Johnson / Jeffrey Moe6-4, 6-4
2021-11-05vs Goodwin Love at first serveWon 10
W#3 DoublesEmperatriz Fernandez / Alejandro Trevino vs Angel Nasrabadi / Gian Franco Valenzuela6-3, 6-3
2021-10-22vs Homsey 7.0 - Fall Early StartLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmperatriz Fernandez / Alejandro Trevino vs Roberta Gibbons / Jeffrey Johnson3-6, 2-6
2021-10-15vs Boese B&W Ruff Early StartWon 10
W#3 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Naime Berge / Steve Boese6-2, 6-4
2021-10-08Won 10
W#3 DoublesTia Fjelstad / Alejandro Trevino vs Jamie Lauler / James McCann6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 MX have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Phillip Chase
published 4.5
3.97
Eran Singer
published 4
3.80
Koushik Dutta
published
3.66
Laura Huck
published
3.39
Daniel Edwardson
published 3.5
3.18
Alejandro Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
2.94
Jennifer Lewis
published
2.93
Beth Snyder
published 3
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
published
Nik Larsen
published
Ryan Wolff
published
Tia Fjelstad
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Koushik Dutta + Laura Huck10160% games+12.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Phillip Chase
112W–51L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4
Eran Singer
41W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%58%42%
3.97
Koushik Dutta
45W–28L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Laura Huck
16W–15L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.66
3.5
Daniel Edwardson
99W–70L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%19%
3.39
3.5
Alejandro Trevino
221W–280L career · 9 lines in 2022
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Emperatriz Fernandez
33W–25L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.17
Jennifer Lewis
28W–39L career · no lines in 2022
67%33%<1%
2.94
3
Beth Snyder
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%71%29%
2.93
Lauren Smith-Kiewel
2W–7L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nik Larsen
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Ryan Wolff
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Tia Fjelstad
0W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.