Teams

TOC.Kumar

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-09-28vs LOCH.WatersWon 10
W#2 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Samir Parikh vs Dan Robinson / Trevor Hoyles6-4, 6-2
2023-09-24vs APEX.FriedmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesSridhar Yelakanti / Ravi Karanam vs McKane Kinchen / Qi Zhang4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-09-20vs TOC.XiaoLost 12
L#1 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Sateesh Pallapothu vs Stephen Fu / Abhimanyu Joshi6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSridhar Yelakanti / Ravi Karanam vs Sergei Krasnyanski / Wayne Xiao4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMahesh Salian / Vipul Pandya vs Luo Xiao / Jay Thakkar2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-09-13vs APEX.KumarLost 02
L#1 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Ravi Karanam vs Vimal Kumar / Guru Mallesh6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMahesh Salian / Snehansu Roy vs Ranga Narasimhan / Manik Parsa2-6, 1-6
2023-09-10vs TOC.FridayLost 01
L#3 DoublesMahesh Salian / Snehansu Roy vs Jeff Friday / Stephen Jeltema1-6, 3-6
2023-08-31vs TOC.XiaoLost 01
L#1 DoublesMahesh Salian / Ravi Karanam vs Abhimanyu Joshi / Stephen Fu3-6, 3-6
2023-08-22vs APEX.ArithotiWon 10
W#1 DoublesMahesh Salian / Snehansu Roy vs Shenba Maruthamuthu / Muthuraj Krishnan6-3, 6-2
2023-08-16vs APEX.FriedmanWon 20
W#1 DoublesKiran Ramaswamy / Arun Kumar vs McKane Kinchen / Jeff Davis6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMahesh Salian / Snehansu Roy vs Victor Vo / Fred Friedman6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.65
Kiran Ramaswamy
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.33
Sridhar Yelakanti
published
3.30
Mahesh Salian
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.21
Snehansu Roy
published
3.06
Nathan Naramor
published
2.87
Ravi Karanam
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Samir Parikh
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kiran Ramaswamy
178W–129L career · 6 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.65
Sridhar Yelakanti
1W–2L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Mahesh Salian
66W–62L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
Snehansu Roy
3W–1L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.21
Nathan Naramor
1W–6L career · no lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.06
3
Ravi Karanam
36W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
2.87
Samir Parikh
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.