Teams

LOCH.Waters

2023 CTRL Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-01Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Kenneth Waters vs Sajan John / Melwyn Joachim6-7, 5-7
2023-09-28vs TOC.FridayWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Adam Schwartz vs Stephen Mcowen / Barry Gitarts6-4, 7-5
2023-09-28vs TOC.KumarLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Adam Schwartz vs Nathan Naramor / Arun Kumar4-6, 2-6
2023-09-24vs APEX.ArithotiWon 10
W#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Trevor Hoyles vs Somitra Upadhyaya / Shenba Maruthamuthu6-0, 7-6
2023-09-10vs APEX.FriedmanLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Mark Wolff vs McKane Kinchen / Vinay Kadimisetty2-6, 2-6
2023-08-20vs TOC.XiaoLost 01
L#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Paul Bridgers vs Stephen Fu / Jason Fu6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-08-13vs APEX.KumarLost 01
L#1 DoublesDaryn Watson / Kenneth Waters vs Ranga Narasimhan / Manik Parsa0-6, 2-6
2023-08-06vs APEX.ArithotiWon 10
W#2 DoublesDaryn Watson / Mark Wolff vs Kumar Raman / Shenba Maruthamuthu6-4, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Combo 18 & Over 6.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.92 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Dan Robinson
published 3.5
3.18
Trevor Hoyles
published
3.12
Daryn Watson
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
2.92
Arthur Gloer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.80
Mark Wolff
published
Adam Schwartz
published 3
2.71
Kenneth Waters
published
2.38
Johnny Blevins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kenneth Waters + Arthur Gloer123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dan Robinson
12W–32L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.30
Trevor Hoyles
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Daryn Watson
36W–80L career · 8 lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.12
3
Arthur Gloer
39W–59L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%71%28%
2.92
Mark Wolff
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Adam Schwartz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kenneth Waters
4W–13L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
2.71
Johnny Blevins
1W–10L career · no lines in 2023
81%19%<1%
2.38

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.