Ortis-Bouche/18s/3.0/PAC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

Schedule

Flight standings8 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

Team	W	L	Ind. W	Ind. L	Sets lost	Games lost
1Smith/18s/3.0/SC	7	0	17	4	10	158
2Caswell/18s/3.0/NC	6	1	16	5	13	145
3Daskalova/18s/3.0/BC	4	3	10	11	22	179
4Miller/3.0/18s/FAC	4	3	11	10	24	199
5Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC	4	3	11	10	24	206
6Schulze/18s/3.0/NC	2	5	6	15	32	222
7Guillet/18s/3.0/COQ	1	6	7	14	30	211
8Ortis-Bouche/18s/3.0/PAC	0	7	6	15	31	222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.03

Molly Burns

usually #2 Doubles 62%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published —

2.85

Kristin Higbee

usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published —

2.60

Alexander Klocek

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3

2.46

Alexander Mata Iv

usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5

—

Elizabeth Klocek

usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published —

—

Jamie Vogel

usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published —

—

Jason Ortis

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published —

—

Landon Brown

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published —

—

Megan Baum

usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 25% · published —

—

R Timothy Brown

usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 42% · published —

—

Rebecca Sandoz

usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 35% · published —

—

Taylor Bouche

usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 24% · published —

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

—

Molly Burns

33W–13L career · 20 lines in 2026

<1%43%57%

3.03

—

Kristin Higbee

23W–20L career · 16 lines in 2026

1%85%14%

2.85

Alexander Klocek

7W–5L career · type M · 9 lines in 2026

23%77%<1%

2.60

2.5

Alexander Mata Iv

14W–30L career · type S · 30 lines in 2026

0%61%39%

2.46

—

Elizabeth Klocek

8W–18L career · 16 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jamie Vogel

12W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Jason Ortis

14W–33L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Landon Brown

9W–12L career · 9 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Megan Baum

14W–5L career · 8 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

R Timothy Brown

16W–33L career · 24 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Rebecca Sandoz

29W–18L career · 23 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Taylor Bouche

21W–6L career · 21 lines in 2026

not enough data

—

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.