Teams

Daskalova/18s/3.0/BC

2026 Man · Cov Mixed 18 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.00 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule
Flight standings8 teams · Cov Mixed 18 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Smith/18s/3.0/SC7017410158
2Caswell/18s/3.0/NC6116513145
3Daskalova/18s/3.0/BC43101122179
4Miller/3.0/18s/FAC43111024199
5Parvizian/18s/3.0/SC43111024206
6Schulze/18s/3.0/NC2561532222
7Guillet/18s/3.0/COQ1671430211
8Ortis-Bouche/18s/3.0/PAC0761531222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
Alex Faucheux
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published 3
2.92
Aric Dunaway
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Singles 31% · published 3
2.92
Cathy West
usually #2 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.70
December Best
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3
2.69
Ben Oser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Japonica Cruise
usually #3 Doubles 55%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Keith Shepherd
usually #2 Doubles 64%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published
Lori Rase
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Paula Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Reagan Daskalova
usually #2 Singles 31%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Samantha Karlin Dunaway
usually #1 Singles 39%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published
Ted Ashby
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 31% · published
Toni Shepherd
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
Zain Kassam
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lori Rase + Ted Ashby11854% gamesnot enough data
Samantha Karlin Dunaway + Aric Dunaway6653% gamesnot enough data
Toni Shepherd + Keith Shepherd4450% gamesnot enough data
Lori Rase + Toni Shepherd4349% gamesnot enough data
Japonica Cruise + Toni Shepherd213 matchesnot enough data
Ted Ashby + Zain Kassam213 matchesnot enough data
Ted Ashby + Keith Shepherd123 matchesnot enough data
Toni Shepherd + Cathy West303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alex Faucheux
10W–3L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Aric Dunaway
18W–12L career · 16 lines in 2026
<1%71%28%
2.92
3
Cathy West
37W–25L career · 36 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
December Best
5W–7L career · 11 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
2.70
3
Ben Oser
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
2.69
Japonica Cruise
16W–13L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Keith Shepherd
7W–12L career · 11 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lori Rase
22W–27L career · 30 lines in 2026
not enough data
Paula Thomas
15W–9L career · 12 lines in 2026
not enough data
Reagan Daskalova
26W–15L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Samantha Karlin Dunaway
17W–15L career · 13 lines in 2026
not enough data
Ted Ashby
29W–22L career · 35 lines in 2026
not enough data
Toni Shepherd
31W–24L career · 36 lines in 2026
not enough data
Zain Kassam
7W–3L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.