Teams

Western: Hughes

2023 55&Over Women · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-16vs MonczynskiWon 21
L#1 DoublesSilva Banboukian Serghany / Teresa Arena vs Alice Curtiss / Michelle Plimpton1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesNancy Rehak / June Brennan vs Heather Harmon / Julie la Barbera7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesClaudia Smolinski / Nancy Wingerter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-08-09vs On the BallWon 21
L#1 DoublesTeresa Arena / Jan Coleman vs Audrey Cohn / Tami Micallef4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesRowena de Perio / Michele McGrath vs Maureen Rasp-Glose / Helen Marlette6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKaren Hughes / Jean Jurek vs Kathleen Banks / Cheryl Athoe6-2, 6-4
2023-08-02vs CapenhurstWon 21
W#1 DoublesSilva Banboukian Serghany / Julie Cimorelli vs Connie Littlewood / Geok Leung6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesTeresa Arena / Claudia Smolinski vs Carol Salvatore / Karen Ricciardi7-5, 6-2
L#3 DoublesNancy Wingerter / June Brennan vs Linda Capenhurst / Mary Grace Duggan6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2023-07-26vs MonczynskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesRowena de Perio / Michele McGrath vs Julie la Barbera / Alice Curtiss6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSilva Banboukian Serghany / Claudia Smolinski vs Joyce Monczynski / Michelle Plimpton6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJean Jurek / Nancy Wingerter vs Julie Johnson / Heather Harmon6-2, 4-6, 1-0
2023-07-19vs On the BallWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichele McGrath / Jan Coleman vs Katalin Mechtler / Maureen Rasp-Glose6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKaren Hughes / Teresa Arena vs Audrey Cohn / Helen Marlette3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesNancy Rehak / Julie Cimorelli vs Tami Micallef / Lemore OHANRAHAN6-1, 7-5
2023-07-13vs CapenhurstWon 20
W#1 DoublesMichele McGrath / Nancy Rehak vs Mary Grace Duggan / Karen Ricciardi7-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Hughes / Jean Jurek vs Shirley Weisenborn / Cheryl Turner4-6, 6-4, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Hughes6013514142
2On the Ball4211717149

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Jan Coleman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Claudia Smolinski
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.80
Michele McGrath
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.79
Nancy Rehak
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.61
Rowena de Perio
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Teresa Arena
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.56
Nancy Wingerter
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Jean Jurek
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.45
June Brennan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Cimorelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Karen Hughes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Silva Banboukian Serghany
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rowena de Perio + Michele McGrath12758% games+5.4% vs expected
Silva Banboukian Serghany + Rowena de Perio20660% games+2.9% vs expected
Jan Coleman + Nancy Rehak7061% games+2.9% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Michele McGrath19460% games+2.7% vs expected
Claudia Smolinski + June Brennan5356% games+1.8% vs expected
Jan Coleman + Michele McGrath321160% games−0.3% vs expected
Teresa Arena + Michele McGrath331955% games−1.1% vs expected
Nancy Rehak + Nancy Wingerter3252% games−1.1% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jan Coleman
89W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.82
4
Claudia Smolinski
47W–35L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Michele McGrath
107W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Nancy Rehak
101W–61L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.79
4
Rowena de Perio
92W–55L career · 2 lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.61
4
Teresa Arena
60W–44L career · 4 lines in 2023
31%69%<1%
3.56
Nancy Wingerter
32W–15L career · 2 lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.56
Jean Jurek
32W–26L career · 8 lines in 2023
60%40%<1%
3.47
June Brennan
46W–39L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%66%34%
3.45
Julie Cimorelli
33W–27L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Hughes
21W–14L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Silva Banboukian Serghany
42W–11L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.