Teams

On the Ball

2023 55&Over Women · 8.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.62 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-16vs CapenhurstWon 21
L#1 DoublesKatalin Mechtler / Kathleen Banks vs Carol Salvatore / Karen Ricciardi2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMary-Ann Jolley / Helen Marlette vs Connie Littlewood / Colleen Darby6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCheryl Athoe / Tami Micallef vs Cheryl Turner / Geok Leung6-2, 6-2
2023-08-09vs Western: HughesLost 12
W#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Tami Micallef vs Teresa Arena / Jan Coleman6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaureen Rasp-Glose / Helen Marlette vs Rowena de Perio / Michele McGrath4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathleen Banks / Cheryl Athoe vs Karen Hughes / Jean Jurek2-6, 4-6
2023-08-02vs MonczynskiWon 30
W#1 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Mary-Ann Jolley vs Alice Curtiss / Joyce Monczynski6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHelen Marlette / Tami Micallef vs Julie Johnson / Heather Harmon7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAndrea Abels / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Michelle Plimpton / Maria Quackenbush7-5, 0-6, 1-0
2023-07-26vs CapenhurstWon 21
W#1 DoublesMaureen Rasp-Glose / Katalin Mechtler vs Karen Ricciardi / Carol Salvatore1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLisa Abeyounis / Audrey Cohn vs Cheryl Turner / Deborah Kiss6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJane Gens / Andrea Abels vs Linda Capenhurst / Mary Grace Duggan3-6, 2-6
2023-07-19vs Western: HughesLost 12
L#1 DoublesKatalin Mechtler / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Michele McGrath / Jan Coleman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAudrey Cohn / Helen Marlette vs Karen Hughes / Teresa Arena6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesTami Micallef / Lemore OHANRAHAN vs Nancy Rehak / Julie Cimorelli1-6, 5-7
2023-07-12vs MonczynskiWon 21
W#1 DoublesAndrea Abels / Jane Gens vs Joyce Monczynski / Julie la Barbera6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa Abeyounis / Mary-Ann Jolley vs Alice Curtiss / Michelle Plimpton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMary Hays / Maureen Rasp-Glose vs Laurie Krajna / Linda Deni6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Western: Hughes6013514142
2On the Ball4211717149

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Audrey Cohn
usually #1 Doubles 79%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published 4
3.38
Katalin Mechtler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.38
Cheryl Athoe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.37
Kathleen Banks
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.02
Andrea Abels
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Helen Marlette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Jane Gens
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Lemore OHANRAHAN
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 30% · published
Lisa Abeyounis
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Mary-Ann Jolley
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Maureen Rasp-Glose
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Tami Micallef
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mary-Ann Jolley + Katalin Mechtler6256% games+3.1% vs expected
Kathleen Banks + Katalin Mechtler182045% games−9.2% vs expected
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Katalin Mechtler5252% gamesnot enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose + Audrey Cohn1534% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Abels + Mary-Ann Jolley5061% gamesnot enough data
Andrea Abels + Lemore OHANRAHAN123 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Banks + Cheryl Athoe033 matchesnot enough data
Kathleen Banks + Mary-Ann Jolley303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Cohn
146W–120L career · 14 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.69
3.5
Katalin Mechtler
178W–123L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%80%20%
3.38
3.5
Cheryl Athoe
89W–75L career · 10 lines in 2023
<1%81%19%
3.38
Kathleen Banks
90W–104L career · 4 lines in 2023
82%18%<1%
3.37
3.5
Andrea Abels
16W–27L career · 11 lines in 2023
45%55%<1%
3.02
Helen Marlette
11W–10L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Jane Gens
29W–13L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lemore OHANRAHAN
25W–22L career · 10 lines in 2023
not enough data
Lisa Abeyounis
6W–5L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary-Ann Jolley
107W–93L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Maureen Rasp-Glose
41W–52L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Tami Micallef
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.