Teams

BSF:Pacers and Acers:Coccomo

2023 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.5 Tri Level Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Suzanne Neville vs Joy Fausey / Trixi Kolb2-6, 3-6
2023-10-25vs PRC:No Bubbles:Mauro/TillowWon 10
W#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Shelley Dodd vs Susan Anderson / Martha Tillow6-3, 6-4
2023-10-06vs FV:Tre Love:Sullivan/KeppelWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuzanne Neville / Christine Abreu vs Paula Smyth / Tracy Tietje6-3, 6-1
2023-10-06vs RFL:Love Hurts:SullivanLost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Dodd / Teresa Barton vs Jennifer Herbek / Marcie Danton1-6, 5-7
W#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Suzanne Neville vs Louisa Hogan / Kristin Herzog6-1, 6-4
L#1 DoublesDanielle Coccomo / Christine Abreu vs Julie Walsh / Laura O'Brien3-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Tri Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Pacers and Acers:Coccomo0633654
2FV:Deuces:Bowman/06241071
3BSF:All the singles ladies:Fausey/Kolb0770131
4RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan0752563
5BSF:Some Strings Attached:Horovitz/0743858
6BTC:FOUR The Love of Winners:Walsh/0734870
7PRC:No Bubbles:Mauro/Tillow07251176
8FV:Tre Love:Sullivan/Keppel07161275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Suzanne Neville
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Teresa Barton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Christine Abreu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Danielle Coccomo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.98
Shelley Dodd
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Abreu + Teresa Barton5353% games+4.4% vs expected
Suzanne Neville + Danielle Coccomo6451% games+3.9% vs expected
Christine Abreu + Shelley Dodd4446% games+3.8% vs expected
Christine Abreu + Suzanne Neville8552% games+1.5% vs expected
Shelley Dodd + Teresa Barton101649% games−1.3% vs expected
Suzanne Neville + Shelley Dodd5353% games−3.5% vs expected
Christine Abreu + Danielle Coccomo033 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Dodd + Danielle Coccomo213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Neville
161W–148L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
Teresa Barton
109W–72L career · 1 line in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Christine Abreu
161W–174L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Danielle Coccomo
45W–36L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Shelley Dodd
74W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.