Teams

BSF:Some Strings Attached:Horovitz/

2023 NCT Tri Level Women · 3.5 Tri Level Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTHERN CONNECTICUT

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-13vs FV:Tre Love:Sullivan/KeppelWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouisa Hogan / Debbie Horovitz vs Tracy Tietje / Deborah Sullivan7-5, 6-0
2023-12-06vs RFL:Love Hurts:SullivanLost 01
L#1 DoublesDebbie Horovitz / Louisa Hogan vs Marisa Sullivan / Nan Flanagan6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesKristin Herzog / Debbie Horovitz vs Joy Fausey / Trixi Kolb3-6, 2-6
2023-11-15vs PRC:No Bubbles:Mauro/TillowWon 10
W#1 DoublesLouisa Hogan / Debbie Horovitz vs Susan Anderson / Martha Tillow3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 DoublesGigi Badiola / Debbie Horovitz vs Julie Walsh / Elizabeth Cushman6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2023-10-06vs FV:Deuces:Bowman/Won 10
W#1 DoublesGigi Badiola / Kristin Herzog vs Willi Bowman / Cindy Franklin6-0, 6-0
2023-10-05vs BSF:Pacers and Acers:CoccomoLost 01
L#1 DoublesLouisa Hogan / Kristin Herzog vs Danielle Coccomo / Suzanne Neville1-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings8 teams · 3.5 Tri Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1BSF:Pacers and Acers:Coccomo0633654
2FV:Deuces:Bowman/06241071
3BSF:All the singles ladies:Fausey/Kolb0770131
4RFL:Love Hurts:Sullivan0752563
5BSF:Some Strings Attached:Horovitz/0743858
6BTC:FOUR The Love of Winners:Walsh/0734870
7PRC:No Bubbles:Mauro/Tillow07251176
8FV:Tre Love:Sullivan/Keppel07161275

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.23 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Louisa Hogan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Debbie Horovitz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kristine Blaha
published
3.05
Gigi Badiola
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.01
Kristin Herzog
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Gigi Badiola + Kristin Herzog4353% games+5.0% vs expected
Gigi Badiola + Debbie Horovitz3355% games+4.8% vs expected
Louisa Hogan + Kristine Blaha11455% games+4.7% vs expected
Kristin Herzog + Kristine Blaha5256% games+2.1% vs expected
Debbie Horovitz + Kristine Blaha18955% games+1.8% vs expected
Louisa Hogan + Debbie Horovitz13853% games−0.9% vs expected
Kristin Herzog + Debbie Horovitz3245% games−3.2% vs expected
Gigi Badiola + Louisa Hogan3254% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Louisa Hogan
211W–200L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.40
3.5
Debbie Horovitz
145W–87L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Kristine Blaha
90W–46L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%12%
3.35
3.5
Gigi Badiola
57W–58L career · 2 lines in 2023
35%65%<1%
3.05
Kristin Herzog
36W–26L career · 3 lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.