Teams

LCTA18/Rogers/DannyJones

18 & Over Combo · 5.5 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SOUTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-10-26vs SC 5.5M 18 & Over (Scheper)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCharn Pitiranggon / Jason Baughman vs Brian Pool / Ronnie Neuberg6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesGrady Rogers / Bobby Mathes vs Scott Prince / Thomas Jones6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin Chisholm / Rudy Romano vs John David Scheper / John Coward6-0, 6-2
2025-10-26vs UPTA18C/Woodall/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesCharn Pitiranggon / Jason Baughman vs Chris Fennell / Carlos Lopez6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin Chisholm / Bobby Mathes vs Roger Kanaan / Reece Berry6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesRob Dauch / Rudy Romano vs Thomas Sandborg / Hansen Wetsel6-1, 6-0
2025-10-25vs SC 5.5M 18 & Over (Scheper)Won 21
W#1 DoublesGrady Rogers / Jason Baughman vs John David Scheper / Thomas Jones6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKevin Chisholm / Rob Dauch vs Stephen Alexander / Chris Groves6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesCharn Pitiranggon / Bobby Mathes vs Brian Pool / Damon Remley6-0, 4-6, 0-1
2025-10-25vs UPTA18C/Woodall/BrookstoneWon 30
W#1 DoublesGrady Rogers / Jason Baughman vs Andre Nguyen / Thomas Sandborg6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRob Dauch / Kevin Chisholm vs Chris Troup / Reece Berry6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCharn Pitiranggon / Rudy Romano vs Michael Woodall / Carlos Lopez6-3, 6-2
2024-10-28vs LCTA18/Lawley/St.GeorgeWon 20
W#1 DoublesGrady Rogers / Slava Zeif vs George Lamont Perry / Richard Sutcliffe6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRob Dauch / Kevin Chisholm vs Don Lawley / Robert Bessent6-2, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.30
Charn Pitiranggon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.21
Grady Rogers
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Adam Holzer
published 3
3.12
Kevin Chisholm
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Jason Baughman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Rudy Romano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Eric Casella
published
2.90
Cameron Spell
published 3
2.90
Zach Herbert-burns
published
2.81
Rob Dauch
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.52
Bobby Mathes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.50
Joshua Ambrite
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cameron Spell + Rudy Romano4165% games+14.6% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Rob Dauch8259% games+12.3% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Adam Holzer13461% games+8.7% vs expected
Charn Pitiranggon + Rudy Romano8161% games+3.9% vs expected
Kevin Chisholm + Charn Pitiranggon6162% gamesnot enough data
Rob Dauch + Rudy Romano4357% gamesnot enough data
Kevin Chisholm + Zach Herbert-burns5160% gamesnot enough data
Rob Dauch + Cameron Spell314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charn Pitiranggon
42W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Grady Rogers
68W–36L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.21
3
Adam Holzer
36W–32L career · no lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Kevin Chisholm
49W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Jason Baughman
28W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%64%36%
2.95
Rudy Romano
44W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
2.92
Eric Casella
24W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%27%
2.92
3
Cameron Spell
23W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Zach Herbert-burns
15W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Rob Dauch
29W–13L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
2.5
Bobby Mathes
14W–8L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
0%44%56%
2.52
Joshua Ambrite
20W–27L career · no lines in 2025
51%49%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.