Teams

Team 1 Mojos

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-29vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / Gregory Rabinovich vs Oliver Lee / Aravind Krishna6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesElliott Datlow / James Hosie vs Matt Morgan / Jan Neumann2-6, 3-6
2025-03-01vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandLost 02
L#1 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / David Turner vs Patrick Baer / Oliver Lee2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRohan Raikar / Sheikh Ahmed vs Todd Campbell / Dhiraj Jagasia5-7, 5-4
2025-02-22vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandLost 01
L#2 DoublesSheikh Ahmed / Luis Giraldo vs Matt Morgan / Matthew Geppi1-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-02-08vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMehrban Iranshad / Gregory Rabinovich vs Aravind Krishna / Dhiraj Jagasia6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJames Hosie / David Turner vs Todd Campbell / Patrick Baer4-6, 6-6
2025-01-29vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandWon 10
W#1 DoublesGregory Rabinovich / Sheikh Ahmed vs Jan Neumann / Patrick Baer6-2, 5-2
2025-01-25vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJames Hosie / Gregory Rabinovich vs Dhiraj Jagasia / Todd Campbell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesElliott Datlow / David Turner vs Patrick Baer / Matt Morgan4-6, 4-6
2025-01-11vs Team 2 Baby got BackhandWon 20
W#1 DoublesSheikh Ahmed / Rohan Raikar vs Todd Campbell / RICARDO DURAN6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJose Torres / Elliott Datlow vs Dhiraj Jagasia / Aravind Krishna6-1, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.47 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.81
4.48
James Hosie
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.46
Mehrban Iranshad
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.41
Sheikh Ahmed
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.34
Elliott Datlow
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.33
Luis Giraldo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Jason Wall
published
Rohan Raikar
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Gregory Rabinovich
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.81
4.5
James Hosie
53W–41L career · type A · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%44%
4.48
5
Mehrban Iranshad
126W–72L career · 3 lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
4.46
4.5
Sheikh Ahmed
63W–29L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Elliott Datlow
56W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
4.34
Luis Giraldo
15W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
4.33
Jason Wall
3W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rohan Raikar
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.