Teams

Team 2 Baby got Backhand

2025 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 5.0 Men

8 players · average NTRP 4.70 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-29vs Team 1 MojosWon 10
W#2 DoublesMatt Morgan / Jan Neumann vs Elliott Datlow / James Hosie6-2, 6-3
2025-03-22vs Team 1 MojosLost 01
L#1 DoublesTodd Campbell / Matthew Geppi vs Gregory Rabinovich / Rohan Raikar3-6, 6-7
2025-03-01vs Team 1 MojosWon 10
W#2 DoublesTodd Campbell / Dhiraj Jagasia vs Rohan Raikar / Sheikh Ahmed7-5, 4-5
2025-02-22vs Team 1 MojosWon 20
W#2 DoublesMatt Morgan / Matthew Geppi vs Sheikh Ahmed / Luis Giraldo6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / RICARDO DURAN vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-08vs Team 1 MojosLost 02
L#1 DoublesAravind Krishna / Dhiraj Jagasia vs Mehrban Iranshad / Gregory Rabinovich0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesRICARDO DURAN / Oliver Lee vs Luis Giraldo / Rohan Raikar6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-01-29vs Team 1 MojosLost 01
L#1 DoublesJan Neumann / Patrick Baer vs Gregory Rabinovich / Sheikh Ahmed2-6, 2-5
2025-01-25vs Team 1 MojosSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / Todd Campbell vs James Hosie / Gregory Rabinovich1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRICARDO DURAN / Aravind Krishna vs Rohan Raikar / Jose Torres6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2025-01-11vs Team 1 MojosLost 02
L#1 DoublesTodd Campbell / RICARDO DURAN vs Sheikh Ahmed / Rohan Raikar4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesDhiraj Jagasia / Aravind Krishna vs Jose Torres / Elliott Datlow1-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter 5.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.34 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.40
Oliver Lee
published
4.40
Matthew Geppi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.36
Aravind Krishna
published 5
4.35
RICARDO DURAN
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.29
Dhiraj Jagasia
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 5
4.23
Jan Neumann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Matt Morgan
published
Todd Campbell
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Oliver Lee
31W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
4.40
5
Aravind Krishna
37W–48L career · no lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
4.36
4.5
RICARDO DURAN
102W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
4.35
5
Dhiraj Jagasia
99W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
4.29
4.5
Jan Neumann
89W–60L career · 4 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Matt Morgan
5W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Todd Campbell
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.